Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4125 - DUBLIN-3, a Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC Phase (Ph)3 Trial Comparing the Plinabulin (P)/Docetaxel(D) Combination with D Alone
Presenter: Ramon Mohanlal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3345 - Escalation plans and DNACPR discussions in the unwell oncology patient
Presenter: Raghad Elghadi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4165 - The Relation between the Symptom Burden of Hospitalized Patients with Incurable Cancer and the Quality-of-Life of Their Family Caregivers
Presenter: Eman Tawfik
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1784 - Clinical predictors for analgesic response to radiotherapy in patients with painful bone metastases
Presenter: Ragnhild Habberstad
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5323 - 30-Day Mortality in Palliative Radiotherapy
Presenter: Shing Fung Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3942 - The relationship between Naldemedine administration and the maximum dose of oral opioids
Presenter: Shinya Kajiura
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3698 - Exposure to low energy amplitude modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) is associated with rapid improvement in quality of life (QoL) status in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), using various analyses of EORTC-C30.
Presenter: Elizabeth Santana
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3885 - Olanzapine Combined with 5-HT3 RA Plus Dexamethasone for Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in High and Moderate Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5700 - Early Palliative care in advanced cancer, is it really effective?
Presenter: Raquel Gómez Bravo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5924 - Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Cancer Patients
Presenter: Simon Reuter
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract