Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2432 - Retrospective comparative study of the efficacy and safety in docetaxel and ramucirumab combination chemotherapy with or without previous immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
Presenter: Daijiro Harada
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2791 - Efficacy of weekly paclitaxel-bevacizumab combination in advanced non squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) : a retrospective multicentric study.
Presenter: Geoffroy Bilger
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2916 - Post progression survival for patients treated with docetaxel/nintedanib in the SENECA trial
Presenter: Enrica Capelletto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1427 - Final results of randomized phase II trial of metronomic vs weekly oral vinorelbine (OV) as first-line chemotherapy (CT) in advanced NSCLC patients unfit to platinum-based CT (P-CT): Tempo-Lung EudraCT Number: 2014-003859-61
Presenter: Dariusz Kowalski
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3789 - Pioglitazone and clarithromycin combined with metronomic low-dose chemotherapy versus nivolumab in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer treated in 2nd-line and beyond: Outcomes from a randomized phase II trial (ModuLung)
Presenter: Daniel Heudobler
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1519 - Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the National Hospital Organization in Japan
Presenter: Masaki Kanazu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1874 - A prospective phase II trial of carboplatin (CBDCA) and nab-paclitaxel (nabPTX) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with interstitial lung disease (ILD)
Presenter: Toshiyuki Harada
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3819 - Weekly Epirubicin as palliative treatment in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Presenter: Paola Candido
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3390 - Survival Prolongation by Rationale INnovative Genomics (SPRING): An international WIN Consortium phase I study exploring safety and efficacy of avelumab, palbociclib, and axitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with integrated genomic and transcriptomic correlates.
Presenter: Benjamin Solomon
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5069 - Preliminary results from phase 1b study of spartalizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Armando Santoro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract