Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2041 - Efficacy results of selective AXL inhibitor bemcentinib with pembrolizumab following chemo in patients with NSCLC
Presenter: Jose Trigo Perez
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5444 - Analysis of the tumor microenvironment and tumor genotype through different stages of lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Peter Zink
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3124 - Does Progress achieved in the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) reach the Elderly Population?
Presenter: Jorune Suipyte
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5142 - Prognostic factors for non-small cell lung cancer patients with driver mutation negative and brain metastases (HOT 1701)
Presenter: Yoshihito Ohhara
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1580 - A novel risk classification system based on nomogram scores to predict survival of patients presenting with brain metastases at the first diagnosis of NSCLC
Presenter: Pengfei Cui
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4442 - Comparison of real-world response rate (rwRR) to RECIST-based response rate in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)
Presenter: Xinran Ma
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5405 - Estimating the cost and survival impact of new aNSCLC therapies in Canada with the iTEN model
Presenter: Parneet Kaur Cheema
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1893 - SMARCA4 Deficient Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) Study
Presenter: Stephen Graziano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5582 - Exploring Resistance to Nivolumab [NIV] applying an Immune Genomic Signature (IGS) in advanced pretreated NSCLC [PRINCiPe study]
Presenter: Sara Pilotto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1408 - DNA damage repair deficiency is associated with early resistance to crizotinib: whole-genome analysis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK-fusion
Presenter: Dongyun He
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract