Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5751 - Phase 3 ALTA-3 study of brigatinib (BRG) vs alectinib (ALC) in patients (pts) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)−positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that progressed on crizotinib (CRZ)
Presenter: Sanjay Popat
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5103 - CANOPY phase 3 program: Three studies evaluating canakinumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Luis Paz-Ares
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3666 - The Elderly Patient Individualized Chemotherapy (EPIC) trial, a study for an aged population of non-small cell lung cancer.
Presenter: Francesco Passiglia
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4799 - KEYNOTE-495/KeyImPaCT: A Randomized, Biomarker-Directed, Phase 2 Trial of Pembrolizumab-Based Therapy for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Martin Gutierrez
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
6035 - Safety, tolerability and activity of autologous T cells with enhanced T-cell receptors specific to NY ESO 1/LAGE 1a (GSK3377794) alone, or in combination with pembrolizumab, in advanced non small cell lung cancer: A Phase 1b/2a randomised pilot study
Presenter: Karen Reckamp
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2176 - IFCT-1701 DICIPLE: a randomized phase 3 trial comparing continuation Nivolumab-Ipilimumab doublet immunotherapy until progression versus observation in patients with PDL1-positive stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) after Nivolumab-Ipilimumab induction treatment
Presenter: Gerard Zalcman
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2352 - ATALANTE-1 randomized phase 3 trial, OSE-2101 versus standard treatment as second or third line in HLA-A2 positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients
Presenter: Enriqueta Felip
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2451 - Phase Ib dose-escalation/expansion study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4285 - Radiosurgery followed by Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) for brain metastases (1-10) from NSCLC in the phase 3 METIS trial
Presenter: Minesh Mehta
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4909 - Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) versus chemotherapy plus nivolumab (CN) in squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC): the SQUINT trial
Presenter: Lorenza Landi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract