Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5239 - Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients (pts) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in US clinical practice
Presenter: Matthew Krebs
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5595 - Is there any prognostic significance in pleural involvement and/or effusion (Ple-I/E) in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC?
Presenter: Saadettin Kilickap
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5840 - Crizotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic ROS1-rearranged lung cancer (EUCROSS): A European phase 2 clinical trial – Updated progression-free survival, overall survival and mechanisms of resistance
Presenter: Sebastian Michels
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1905 - NTRK1-3 Genomic Fusions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Determined by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling
Presenter: Sai-Hong Ou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3016 - Preferential expression of the affected MET allele in lung carcinomas with heterozygous MET exon 14 skipping mutations: implications for clinical testing
Presenter: Evgeny Imyanitov
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4120 - Brain metastases, treatment patterns and outcomes in ROS1-positive NSCLC patients from US oncology community centers
Presenter: Matthew G Krebs
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3764 - Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and targetable molecular alterations in Germany. Treatment and first outcome data from the prospective German Registry Platform CRISP (AIO-TRK-0315)
Presenter: Frank Griesinger
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4070 - Crizotinib vs Platinum-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Different ROS1 Fusion Variants
Presenter: Haiyan Xu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5528 - Genomic and clinical characterization of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring mutations in FGFR2 and FGFR3
Presenter: Matthias Scheffler
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3779 - The expression of HER2-gene polymorphisms -1985G>T and P1170A C>G and their association with the risk of development of lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Ivan Aleric
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract