Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1728 - A phase III trial evaluating olanzapine 5 mg for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin: J-FORCE Study
Presenter: Hironobu Hashimoto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
920 - Efficacy of intravenous (IV) NEPA, a fixed NK1/5-HT3 receptor antagonist (RA) combination, for prevention of CINV following cisplatin- and anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy (CT)
Presenter: Lee Schwartzberg
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5146 - Efficacy of olanzapine combination in prevention of nausea & vomiting in highly emetogenic chemotherapy
Presenter: Smitha Saldanha
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1947 - Patient-reported outcome data during real-world use of NEPA for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in high-risk platin-receiving patients - A prospective multicenter trial
Presenter: Meinolf Karthaus
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
6163 - A study evaluating steroid induced metabolic syndrome after antiemetic dexamethasone therapy in patients received high emetic risk chemotherapy
Presenter: Hee Jun Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2154 - High incidence of nausea during initial and repeated courses if intravenous chemotherapy in patients receiving guideline consistent antiemetic prophylaxis - a prospective, observational, real world study.
Presenter: Teresa Smit
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1637 - "Randomised controlled trial of Scalp Cooling (SC) for the prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Alopecia (CIA)”
Presenter: Jyoti Bajpai
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5351 - Performance of the ‘4S rule’ to predict short-term outcomes in cancer outpatients with unsuspected pulmonary embolism.
Presenter: David Pesántez Coronel
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1189 - Prevalence of venous thromboembolism based on intensive screening for patients with advanced solid tumor in prospective observational study
Presenter: Shota Omori
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4340 - Short-term outcomes of cancer patients with pulmonary embolism according to the setting (hospital-acquired vs. outpatient) at diagnosis.
Presenter: Diego Muñoz Guglielmetti
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract