Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4325 - Multiple synchronous mechanisms may contribute to osimertinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: insights of the MATCH-R study
Presenter: Diego Enrico
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2185 - Sequential treatment with afatinib followed by 3rd generation EGFR-TKI – subgroup analysis of the GIDEON trial: a prospective non-interventional study (NIS) in EGFR mutated NSCLC patients in Germany
Presenter: Wolfgang Brückl
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1524 - Effectiveness of sequencing TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A French National medico administrative claim database analysis
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5733 - Phase II study of osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation: A multicenter trial of the Korean Cancer Study Group (LU17-19)
Presenter: Tae Min Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5440 - Different stories for different EGFR exon 19 deletion variants
Presenter: Chao Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2982 - Safety and activity of alflutinib in patients with advanced EGFR T790M mutation non-small cell lung cancer who progressed after EGFR-TKI therapy
Presenter: Yuan-Kai Shi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4002 - Afatinib followed by osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) advanced NSCLC: updated data from the GioTag real-world study
Presenter: Maximilian Hochmair
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2941 - Treatment patterns of EGFR mt+ NSCLC IV pts: Real world data of the NOWEL network
Presenter: Julia Roeper
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4154 - TP53 mutations predicts worse prognosis in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving TKIs in first- or further line of treatment
Presenter: Matteo Canale
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1175 - HER3 ligand heregulin expression and clinical implication in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Presenter: Kimio Yonesaka
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract