Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2023 - Patients with brain metastases treated with afatinib in clinical practice – results from the prospective non-interventional study GIDEON
Presenter: Eckart Laack
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1613 - Lerociclib (G1T38), an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, dosed continuously in combination with osimertinib for EGFRmut non-small cell lung cancer: initial Phase 1b results
Presenter: David Berz
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2853 - Real-world implementation of sequential targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated NSCLC
Presenter: Petros Christopoulos
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1974 - A Phase II Open-Label, Multicentre Study to Assess the Anti-tumour Activity of Afatinib in Patients with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor mutation (EGFRm) from Circulating Tumor DNA (CtDNA)
Presenter: Young-Chul Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3370 - Influence of cow’s milk on the absorption and exposure of erlotinib in NSCLC patients
Presenter: Geerten Veerman
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5900 - PTEN loss as Predictor of Tumor Heterogeneity (TH) and Poor Prognosis in EGFR-mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ANSCLC) Patients (pts) Receiving Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs).
Presenter: Miriam Ferrara
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1302 - Safety of lorlatinib in subgroups of patients from a phase 1/2 trial
Presenter: Enriqueta Felip
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1497 - Brigatinib (BRG) in Asian vs non-Asian patients (pts) with crizotinib (CRZ)-refractory ALK+ NSCLC in the phase 2 ALTA trial
Presenter: Dae Ho Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2349 - The safety assessment of crizotinib and alectinib from real world data of 840 ALK-inhibitor naïve patients with NSCLC harboring ALK-rearrangement (WJOG9516L).
Presenter: Kei Kunimasa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1120 - Brigatinib in ALK TKI-pretreated ALK+ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC): the Use Via Expanded Access to Brigatinib (UVEA-Brig) study
Presenter: Silvia Novello
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract