Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4615 - Proteomic Profiling Identifies Molecular Basis of Adverse Event to BPM31510 Exposure: Rationale for Comprehensive Molecular Pharmacodynamics (PD) in Phase 1 Clinical Trial Design
Presenter: Vivek Subbiah
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5052 - Identification of first-in-class, naturally occurring LAG3 checkpoint inhibitor
Presenter: Gennady Bratslavsky
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5336 - Are Epigenetic therapies modifying sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy?
Presenter: Alexandra Bizot
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5739 - Oncogenic mutations at the dimer interface of EGFR lead to formation of covalent homo-dimers and allosteric activation of the kinase domain: A mechanism which alters the selectivity profile of oncogenic EGFR.
Presenter: Elizabeth Buck
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5492 - Basic selective estrogen receptor degraders (B-SERDs) in combination with novel BET inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer
Presenter: Rui Xiong
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5965 - EPI-7386 is a novel N-terminal domain androgen receptor inhibitor for the treatment of prostate cancer
Presenter: Ronan Le Moigne
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3582 - AVID200 neutralizes TGF-beta1 and -beta3, the principal immunosuppressive TGF-beta isoforms overexpressed by tumors, and sensitizes tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Presenter: Tina Gruosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1996 - High NAMPT expression and anti-tumor activity of NAMPT inhibitor in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma
Presenter: Tomohiro Kozako
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4307 - TPX-0046 is a novel and potent RET/SRC inhibitor for RET-driven cancers
Presenter: Alexander Drilon
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4869 - In Vivo Evaluation of Cisplatin-loaded PEG-PCL Block Copolymeric Nanoparticles for Anticancer Drug Delivery
Presenter: Yingtzu Yen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract