Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2935 - Correlation of progression free survival-2 and overall survival in solid tumors
Presenter: Paul Mainwaring
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2273 - High performance of serial tumor biopsies in first in human (FIH) phase I trials.
Presenter: Jun Sato
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5933 - Response rates and lesion-level progression patterns of solid tumor patients in an academic phase 1 program: implications for tumor heterogeneity
Presenter: Christopher Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3569 - Clinical Benefit and Response Rate in Early Phase Clinical Trials: First Report from a Single-Institution Study
Presenter: Antonio Marra
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4139 - Patient (pt) selection for immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials (ieCTs): a single Phase I Unit experience
Presenter: Matteo Simonelli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4451 - Improving patient selection for immuno-oncology phase 1 trials: an external validation of five prognostic scores at Claudius Regaud Institute of Toulouse, Oncopôle (IUCT-O).
Presenter: Ghassan Al Darazi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1696 - Demonstrating the Changing Trends in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
Presenter: Christina Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3202 - Participation of Women in phase 1 oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Laura Vidal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4518 - Predictors for early trial discontinuation of patients with cancer participating in phase I clinical trials
Presenter: Joeri Douma
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4368 - Safety of Tumor Treating Fields delivery to the torso: Meta analysis from TTFields clinical trials
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract