Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5152 - Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can categorize elderly glioblastoma (GBM) patients into three groups predicting survival: a monoinstitutional study
Presenter: Eleonora Bergo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4079 - Triggering anti-GBM immune response with EGFR-mediated photoimmunotherapy
Presenter: Gabriela Kramer-marek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4364 - Upregulation of sFRP3 circulating expression levels correlates survival outcomes in glioblastoma
Presenter: Gema Bruixola
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2327 - Characterization and pre-clinical modeling of genetic aberrations in pediatric gliomas
Presenter: Itai Moshe
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3154 - Preclinical Study of Novel Tetracyclic Small Molecule, CC12, for Brain Cancer
Presenter: Liyun Fann
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5759 - CHLOROBRAIN phase IB trial: The addition of chloroquine, an autophagy inhibitor, to concurrent radiation and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
Presenter: Inge Compter
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1382 - A Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Combined with dose-dense Temozolomide in Recurrent Glioblastoma
Presenter: Yong Wang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4407 - Phase 0 Trial of Ceritinib in Brain Metastases and Recurrent Glioblastoma
Presenter: Shwetal Mehta
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1469 - Pembrolizumab (Pem) in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) patients with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd): an observational study
Presenter: Mario Caccese
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4217 - Outcome of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) treated into immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials (ieCTs): a single-center experience
Presenter: Matteo Simonelli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract