Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5054 - Inhibition of Rspo-Wnt pathway Facilitates Checkpoint Blockade Therapy by anti-RSPO3 antibody (DBPR117)
Presenter: John Hsu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3305 - A phase I dose-escalation and expansion trial of intratumorally administered CV8102, alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Jürgen Krauss
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5353 - Phase 1/2 Study of 9-ING-41, a small molecule selective Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Beta (GSK-3β) Inhibitor, as a Single Agent and Combined with Chemotherapy, in Patients with Refractory Hematological Malignancies or Solid Tumors
Presenter: Benedito Carneiro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3946 - Trial in progress: a Phase I, open-label study of GSK1795091 administered in combination with immunotherapies in participants with advanced solid tumors (NCT03447314).
Presenter: Aaron Hansen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3449 - Radiographic Phenotyping to Identify Intracranial Disseminated Recurrence in Brain metastases Treated With Radiosurgery Using Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Presenter: CheYu Hsu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4553 - Association between TP53 mutations and efficacy of Osimertinib for brain metastasis from EGFR-mutant lung cancer
Presenter: Lijuan Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4942 - Response assessment of melanoma brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiotherapy or immunotherapy or both: a comparison of RECIST 1.1, RANO and iRANO criteria
Presenter: Emilie Le Rhun
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3529 - Management of multiple brain metastases by Staged SRS focusing on utmost risk lesions
Presenter: shaoqun Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5315 - Whole brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous in-field boost versus whole brain radiotherapy plus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Lu Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1116 - 3D based texture analysis serving as potential diagnostic factor in discriminating primary central nervous system lymphoma from metastatic brain tumors: A preliminary study
Presenter: Wen Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract