Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4085 - A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumor Activity of ADCT-601 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Anthony Tolcher
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1054 - Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of cosibelimab, an anti‐PD‐L1 antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced cancers
Presenter: Philip Clingan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4264 - A Phase I study of tinostamustine in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Alain Mita
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3811 - Lurbinectedin (LUR) in combination with Irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Santiago Ponce Aix
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1311 - A phase I study of varlitinib (VAR; ASLAN001) an oral pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with mFOLFIRI chemotherapy in advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Aaron Tan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3482 - Phase I study of lapatinib and trametinib in patients with KRAS mutant colorectal, non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Sanne Huijberts
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4749 - Pharmacokinetic (PK) and updated survival data from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group IND.226 study of durvalumab ± tremelimumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy
Presenter: Desiree Hao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4530 - A Phase 2a clinical trial combining ALRN-6924 and palbociclib for the treatment of patients with tumors harboring wild-type p53 and MDM2 amplification or MDM2/CDK4 co-amplification
Presenter: Funda Meric-Bernstam
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4280 - Updated Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib in Patients with NTRK Fusion-Positive Tumors: Integrated Analysis of STARTRK-2, STARTRK-1 and ALKA-372-001
Presenter: Christian Rolfo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
6144 - An international randomized cross-over bio-equivalence study of oral paclitaxel + HM30181 compared with weekly intravenous (IV) paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Christopher Jackson
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract