Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3620 - Safety, efficacy, PK and PD biomarker results of the first-in-human study of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) inhibitor BAY 1436032 in patients (pts) with mIDH1 advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Wolfgang Wick
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5465 - Proof of concept clinical study by US-guided intratumor injection of VCN-01, an oncolytic adenovirus expressing hyaluronidase in patients with pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Manuel Hidalgo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2555 - A Phase 1a/b first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation, safety, PK and PD study of TP-0903 in solid tumors
Presenter: John Sarantopoulos
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3533 - First in human phase 1/2a study of PEN-866, a Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90) ligand – SN38 conjugate for patients with advanced solid tumors: Phase 1 results
Presenter: Johanna Bendell
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4114 - A Phase I Open-Label, Non-Randomized Study of Recombinant Super-Compound Interferon (rSIFN-co) In Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Amanda Seet
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2537 - Evaluation of Pharmacodynamic (PD) Biomarkers in Advanced Cancer Patients Treated with Oxidative Phosphorylation (OXPHOS) Inhibitor, OPC-317 (OPC)
Presenter: Jie Qing Eu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5764 - Pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment of BT1718: A phase 1/2a study of BT1718, a first in class Bicycle Toxin Conjugate (BTC), in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Natalie Cook
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2683 - A phase I open label dose escalation trial evaluating VT1021 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Presenter: Wael Harb
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3609 - Interim Results from Trial of SL-801, a Novel XPO-1 Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Judy Wang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3485 - Phase 1 Trial of Fruquintinib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Results of the Dose Escalation Phase
Presenter: Andrea Wang-Gillam
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract