Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4242 - HIV, HBV and HCV screening practices in oncology: a cross-sectional interregional survey
Presenter: Isabelle Poizot-Martin
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1267 - Genetic landscape of KEAP1 and NFE2L2 mutated cancers from the AACR GENIE database
Presenter: Mark Zaki
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
878 - β-arrestin1 is involved in the Ras-induced malignant transformation
Presenter: Takashi Shibano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4143 - Incidence of second cancer among PLWHIV: retrospective observational study of a series of 601 patients in the French CANCERVIH network
Presenter: Jean-Philippe Spano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5145 - A challenging task – Identifying carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) patients according to ESMO guidelines: the CUPISCO trial experience
Presenter: Chantal Pauli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1737 - Incidence and Outcome of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with Deletion 17p: An Indian experience; challenges and opportunities
Presenter: Ajay Gogia
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2596 - Driving solo? Investigation into collaborating mutations in SDH-deficient neoplasia
Presenter: Jonathan Killian
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1499 - The potential of a novel antiangiogenic VEGFR1-D2 binding peptide in oncology therapeutics
Presenter: Afsaneh Sadre Momtaz
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1775 - First-in-human phase I study of TAS-117, an allosteric AKT inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Mayu Yunokawa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4584 - First-in-human study of ABBV-621 in patients (pts) with previously treated sold tumors: Dose-optimization cohorts
Presenter: Emiliano Calvo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract