Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
427P - Sahai: A restorative support to address unmet needs of women with cancer – impact on quality of life
Presenter: Poonam Maurya
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
428P - A pilot study on comparative efficacy of tramadol or eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (prilocaine plus lignocaine) in preventing bone marrow aspiration associated pain
Presenter: Bipinesh Sansar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
429P - Skin pathologic change evaluation of the patients who had EGFR inhibitor-related skin adverse events
Presenter: Sung Yong Oh
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
430P - Emetic risk of carboplatin plus pemetrexed is higher than that of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with lung cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis
Presenter: Koichi Matsuo
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
431P - An in vitro evaluation of CYP2D6 enzymatic inhibition activities of a Chinese herbal medicine formulation (Xiang Bei Yangrong Tang) for the management of cancer-related fatigue
Presenter: Ning Yi Yap
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
432P - Chemotherapy induced extravasation: Incidence and possible predictors
Presenter: Shalaka Somayaji
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
433P - Prospective outcomes of adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients received treatment from a tertiary cancer hospital in Bangladesh
Presenter: Abdullah Al Mamun Khan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
434P - Pneumonitis induced antineoplastic agents: Mortality and risk factors in 129 consecutive cases
Presenter: Sawako Kaku
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
435P - Telephonic communication in palliative care for better management of terminal cancer patients in rural India: An NGO based approach
Presenter: NABANITA MANDAL
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
436P - Assessing the quality of life of Filipino cancer patients: A survey of Filipino oncologists
Presenter: Frederic Ivan Ting
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract