Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
412P - The evaluation of chromosomal changes in patients with osteosarcoma
Presenter: Nargiza Karimova
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
413P - The state of molecular biological markers in osteosarcoma
Presenter: Djamilya Polatova
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
414P - Clinical profile of gastrointestinal stromal tumour in Yangon General Hospital
Presenter: Khin Mu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
415P - Adult soft tissue myoepithelial carcinoma: Treatment outcomes and efficacy of chemotherapy
Presenter: Florence Chamberlain
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
417P - Clinicopathological profile and survival outcomes of sarcomas from a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Divya Bharathi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
418P - Lessons learnt from treatment of foot sarcomas: Analysis from dedicated sarcoma clinic in North India
Presenter: Satyajit Pawar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
423P - Effectiveness of first-generation 5HT3 receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone plus aprepitant in controlling delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis
Presenter: Toshinobu Hayashi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
424P - Cancer worry, genetic knowledge, and attitudes towards NGS multigene panel testing among Korean breast cancer patients
Presenter: Ji Soo Park
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
425P - Economic and safety evaluation of 5-HT3 recepter antagonist conversion from palonosetron to granisetron in highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: A prospective study
Presenter: Keisuke Yamakita
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
426P - Impaired quality of life of caregivers of patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy
Presenter: Nobumichi Takeuchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract