Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
437P - Correlation between bio-impedance analysis and abdominal CT scan to diagnose decreased muscle mass in adult cancer patients
Presenter: Andree Kurniawan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
438P - Evaluating mitochondrial biomarkers between fatigue subclasses identified using latent class analysis in early-stage breast cancer patients
Presenter: Yi Long Toh
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
440P - Accuracy of risk scoring system to determine delayed chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in cancer patients
Presenter: Jada Harika
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
441P - A pilot cross-sectional study on incidence of liver toxicity in cancer patients on western anti-cancer drug therapy with or without concurrent Chinese herbal medicine
Presenter: Tsz Him So
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
442P - Relationship between QOL and support elderly patients with permanent colostomies
Presenter: Yukiko Orii
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
443P - The effectiveness of individual nutritional counselling for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A preliminary study
Presenter: Saori Koshimoto
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
444P - The prophylactic effect of 0.1% fluorometholone eye drops on eye disorders caused by high-dose cytarabine
Presenter: Takayuki Tsuchiya
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
445P - Safety and feasibility of extending flushing interval every 3 months for maintenance of TICVPS in CRC patients after completion of curative intended treatments
Presenter: Sang Bo Oh
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
446P - Accuracy of risk scoring system to determine chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in cancer patients receiving first cycle chemotherapy
Presenter: Jada Harika
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
447P - Hypomagnesaemia: An unnoticed problem in lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation
Presenter: Sharif Ahmed
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract