Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
358P - Evaluation of continuous low dose versus standard dose capecitabine monotherapy as second/third-line chemotherapy for metastatic malignancies
Presenter: Swaroop Revannasiddaiah
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
359P - Factors associated with economic burden among cancer patients with minor children: A cross-sectional web-based survey of an online cancer community
Presenter: Midori Yuki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
360P - Factors influencing treatment decisions among breast cancer patients in the Philippine general hospital cancer institute: Medical oncology outpatient clinic
Presenter: Bobby De Guzman
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
361P - The role of volunteers in quality palliative care delivery
Presenter: NABANITA MANDAL
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
362P - Survey to assess the efficacy of continuity of care delivered through an out of hours telephonic consultation liaison
Presenter: Rahul D. Arora
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
366P - Activity of larotrectinib in TRK fusion cancer patients with primary central nervous system tumours
Presenter: David Ziegler
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
367P - Molecular characteristics and efficacy of crizotinib among different subsets of MET Amplification detected by next-generation sequencing in lung cancer
Presenter: Jing Li
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
368P - Genomic analysis of malaysian breast cancers unravel molecular differences from Caucasian breast cancers
Presenter: Soo-Hwang Teo
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
369P - Institutional-based prospective molecular profiling of advanced solid tumours in Hong Kong: A report of 253 cases
Presenter: Herbert Loong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
370P - Tumour mutation burden analysis in a 5660-cancer-patient cohort reveals cancer type-specific mechanisms for high mutation burden
Presenter: Yuan-Sheng Zang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract