Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
371P - Clinical utility of Encyclopedic tumour analysis to treat patients advanced refractory head and neck cancers
Presenter: Rajnish Nagarkar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
372P - Real-world fusion landscape in advanced Chinese pancreatic cancer using next generation sequecing: A multicenter study
Presenter: Yiyu Shen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
373P - Molecular profiling of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Asia with targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS): Interim analysis of a co-operative group study (ATORG-001)
Presenter: Aaron Tan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
374P - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) identifies actionable genetic alterations in Middle Eastern and Asian (MEA) patients diagnosed with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP)
Presenter: Nir Peled
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
375P - Whole-exome sequencing of tumour-only samples reveals the association between somatic alterations and clinical features in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Huixin Lin
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
376P - Adoption of molecular testing in breast cancer in a tertiary care center in a developing country
Presenter: Prasanta Dash
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
377P - NGS in advanced NSCLC in a developing country: Ready for prime time?
Presenter: Amrith B P
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
378P - Germline BRCA1/2 testing: Trend in Tan Tock Seng Hospital Singapore
Presenter: Chia Wei Lim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
379P - Study of germline mutations in high risk cancer patients from a tertiary care center in India
Presenter: Padmaj Kulkarni
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
380P - Ventricular–Subventricular zone involvement: A predictive factor for survival in glioblastoma
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract