Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
504P - A single center report for safety and efficacy of CT-707 in Chinese patients with advanced, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer or other tumours
Presenter: Peng Song
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
519P - Initial results of lung cancer genomic screening project for individualized medicine in Asia: LC-SCRUM-Asia
Presenter: Chih-Hsi Kuo
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
521P - A randomized, phase II study comparing irinotecan versus amrubicin as maintenance therapy after first-line induction therapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer (HOT1401/NJLCG1401)
Presenter: Keisuke Baba
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
526P - A phase II study of apatinib in patients with recurrent/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Li Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
499P - Prevalence of uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations detected by circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in Hong Kong
Presenter: Oscar Siu Hong Chan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
489P - Overall survival in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC receiving sequential afatinib and osimertinib: Updated analysis of the GioTag study
Presenter: Maximilian J. Hochmair
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
509P - Second-line treatment after first-line vinorelbine in advanced platinum unfit NSCLC patients: An exploratory analysis of randomized Tempo-Lung trial
Presenter: Andrea Camerini
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
500P - Clinico-molecular characteristics of Chinese primary non-small cell lung cancer patients with compound EGFR mutations
Presenter: Jianchun Duan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
527P - A multicenter study of NRG1 fusions in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients and response to afatinib using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Xingliang Li
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
481P - Updated survival outcomes of the phase II study of low starting dose of afatinib as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (KTORG1402)
Presenter: Toshihide Yokoyama
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract