Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
381P - XKR8 is a promising potential prognostic marker in glioblastoma multiforme patients
Presenter: Kristina Havrysh
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
383P - Screening of prognostic molecular biomarker for resectable pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yonggang Peng
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
384P - Prevalence of abnormal microsatellite instability test among ovary and endometrial cancer patients
Presenter: Min Kyu Kim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
385P - Identifying CASP8 polymorphisms associated with breast cancer risk in an Iranian population
Presenter: Alireza Pasdar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
386P - Unusual folding of NaPi2b transporter extramembrane domain 4 during malignant transformation
Presenter: Leysan Minigulova
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
387P - 5-years conditional disease free survival and overall survival for breast cancer patients in South Korea
Presenter: Jee hyun Ahn
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
388P - To identify circulating tumour cells by machine learning approach
Presenter: Yuebin Liang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
389P - The establishment of patient-derived organoid models and drug response of resectable non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Jing-Hua Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
395P - Filipinos and lung cancer: An infodemiological assessment using Google trends from 2009 to 2019
Presenter: Lance Isidore Catedral
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
396P - Determinants of visiting a referral hospital for cervical cancer screening at Uganda Cancer Institute
Presenter: Collins Mpamani
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract