Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
397P - Development of prediction model for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients
Presenter: Teerapat Ungtrakul
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
398P - Planning for future cancer control programs in Uganda: Projections of top five cancers’ incidence in the next decade
Presenter: Judith Asasira
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
399P - Prevalence of colorectal cancer risk factors in apparently healthy adults in Suluhan Village, Bali
Presenter: Cindy Trisina
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
400P - Female lung cancer: Emerging issue in Bangladesh
Presenter: Muhammad Rafiqul Islam
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
402P - Work-related outcomes among cancer survivors in Singapore
Presenter: Chia Jie Tan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
407P - Focal treatments for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) is associated with improved overall survival
Presenter: Ching Tso Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
408P - The Asian sarcoma consortium sarcoma preceptorship program: A program evaluation study utilizing the Kirkpatrick model (Level 1 and 2)
Presenter: Fernando Gracieux Jr.
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
409P - Integrated genomic and transcriptomic analysis revealed mutagenic patterns of dedifferentiated liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma in Chinese patients
Presenter: Yuhong Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
410P - Treatment patterns and outcomes of elderly patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (mSTS)
Presenter: Yu-ju Kuo
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
411P - Comparative analysis of protein profiles of prognosis-associated proteins and KIT-related proteins in gastrointestinal stromal tumour
Presenter: Yoshiyuki Suehara
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract