Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

423P - Effectiveness of first-generation 5HT3 receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone plus aprepitant in controlling delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Toshinobu Hayashi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix140-ix150. 10.1093/annonc/mdz434

Authors

T. Hayashi1, M. Shimokawa2, K. Matsuo3, H. Iihara4, J. Nishimura5, T. Nakano1, T. Egawa1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, 814-0180 - Fukuoka/JP
  • 2 2. department Of Biostatistics, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 755-8505 - Ube/JP
  • 3 Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 818-0067 - Chikushino/JP
  • 4 Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, 501-1193 - Gifu/JP
  • 5 Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 541-8567 - Osaka/JP

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 423P

Background

Delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is not well controlled in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-based chemotherapy. Whether adding a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist to a first-generation 5HT3 antagonist (1st-5HT3RA) and dexamethasone (DEX) is beneficial in patients on L-OHP-based chemotherapy is controversial. It is unclear whether palonosetron (PALO) or aprepitant (APR) is more effective in controlling delayed CINV. We, therefore, investigated whether PALO+DEX (PALO group) or 1st-5HT3RA+DEX+APR (APR group) was more effective in controlling delayed CINV, as well as risk factors for delayed CINV, in patients with CRC treated with L-OHP-based chemotherapy.

Methods

We pooled data from two prospective observational studies in Japan and one phase III clinical trial and compared the incidence of CINV between the PALO and APR groups using propensity score-matched analysis. Risk factors for CINV were identified using logistic regression models.

Results

Among the 404 eligible patients, those in the PALO group showed a higher incidence of delayed CINV than those in the APR group (nausea: 43.4% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.061; vomiting: 12.5% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.017). The logistic regression analysis identified alcohol consumption, motion sickness, and PALO+DEX regimen as independent risk factors for delayed nausea, and female sex and PALO+DEX regimen as those for delayed vomiting.

Conclusions

Treatment with the three antiemetics, including APR, was more effective in controlling delayed CINV than prophylactic treatment with the two antiemetics, including PALO. Thus, patients with CRC receiving L-OHP-based chemotherapy should be treated with three antiemetics, including APR.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.