Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
340TiP - A multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase II trial exploring adjuvant combined therapy of apatinib and SHR-1210 (anti-PD-1), in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after radical resection
Presenter: Shida Yan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
347P - Relationship between modified surgical margin and prognosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Yukiko Teramoto
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
348P - Malignant melanoma: A study of clinical profiles and treatment outcomes in Indian patients
Presenter: Sorun Shishak
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
349P - Flavonoids from ethanol extracts of euphorbia hirta inhibit melanoma growth and metastatic potential
Presenter: Shubhra Mishra
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
350P - Low-dose cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combined concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of 23 cases
Presenter: Azusa Hiura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
353P - A prediction model for the intents regarding life-sustaining treatment decisions in patients with terminal cancer
Presenter: Yoonsun Kim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
354P - Predictive factors and survival outcomes with stereotactic body radiation therapy in treatment of oligometastases in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
355P - Cost analysis and overview of single versus multiple fraction palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis
Presenter: Vinodhkumar Selvaraj
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
356P - Observational study on role of crude cannabis in pain control and quality of life in terminally ill cancer patients: An Indian perspective
Presenter: Vidyasagar Dusi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
357P - Application of multi-modal approach to palliation in end of life head and neck cancer pain
Presenter: Srujana Joga
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract