Abstract 1362P
Background
In aNSCLC, pretreatment CTs help determine TNM stage, an important prognostic factor in treatment decisions, as well as determination of clinical trial eligibility/stratification. However, CTs contain prognostic features beyond TNM stage that are not easily quantifiable or reproducible. We examine an imaging-based artificial intelligence algorithm to predict overall survival (OS) compared to TNM staging.
Methods
IPRO, a fully automated deep learning system extracting 5,341 features from chest CT (including tumor burden, and body/cardiovascular composition), was trained on an independent dataset to generate mortality risk scores. We retrospectively evaluate IPRO compared to TNM stage to predict OS from 2,894 subjects diagnosed with aNSCLC at 17 cancer centers in Alberta from 2008 - 2017. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods are used to estimate covariate effects on OS including a model stratified by stage. We evaluate Harrell’s c-index and AIC as measures of goodness of fit comparing models with IPRO, TNM stage, and IPRO + stage (full model). Smaller values for AIC and larger values of the c-index indicate better models.
Results
Median OS was 4.3 months, 80.3% of patients were stage IV at diagnosis, and 52.6% were male. Hazard ratios for OS by IPRO within stage were 1.39 (IIIB) and 1.34 (IV), suggesting IPRO associations were similar by stage group. The c-index for IPRO was larger than for TNM staging. Removing IPRO from the full model resulted in a larger deterioration in AIC than removal of TNM staging.
Conclusions
IPRO provides better discrimination of OS compared to TNM stage based on the c-index. The addition of stage in the full model negligibly improves goodness of fit. This suggests IPRO is a better predictor of OS than stage in this population and may provide greater utility as a prognostic factor in clinical research. Future analyses will include biomarker status and incorporation of other anatomic regions into the model. Table: 1362P
Summary of goodness of fit statistics
Model | C-index | AIC |
Stage (IIIB vs IV) | 0.54 | 39461.40 |
IPRO | 0.60 | 39299.62 |
Full model (IPRO + stage) | 0.61 | 39226.61 |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Altis Labs, Inc.
Funding
Digital Supercluster, Altis Labs, Inc.
Disclosure
O.F. Khan: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck, Gilead, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Knight Therapeutics, AstraZeneca. J. Riskas:Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. S.A. Haider, O. Samorodova, J. Hennessy, V. Sivan, D. Shah: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. A. Mitchell: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Altis Labs, Inc. F. Baldauf-Lenschen: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc. S. Raman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Knight Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bayer, AstraZeneca, Tersera, Sanofi, Verity Pharma. N.B. Leighl: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, CME/independent lectures: MSD, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent lectures: Novartis, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent CME lecture: BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Independent CME lectures: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Janssen, Inivata/NeoGenomics, Novartis; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lectures: AstraZeneca; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lecture: Janssen, MSD, Sanofi, Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1752P - A retrospective single-center study of outcomes to immune checkpoint blockade-based therapy in leiomyosarcoma
Presenter: Olayode Babatunde
Session: Poster session 06
1753P - Outcomes of multidisciplinary treatment of localized myxofibrosarcoma: Retrospective analysis from a reference center
Presenter: Iwona Kalinowska
Session: Poster session 06
1755P - Multimodal therapy in first line treatment of very high risk Ewing sarcoma patients: Results of the French prospective multicenter COMBINAIR3 phase II trial
Presenter: Valerie Laurence
Session: Poster session 06
1756P - A phase I/II trial of gemcitabine, docetaxel, and hydroxychloroquine in advanced/metastatic osteosarcoma
Presenter: J Andrew Livingston
Session: Poster session 06
1757P - Proceedings of the think tank for osteosarcoma medical advisory board meeting
Presenter: Sant Chawla
Session: Poster session 06
1758P - Real-world efficacy of imatinib in patients with advanced GIST: The LRG registry
Presenter: Gahyun Gim
Session: Poster session 06
1759P - Long-term updated outcomes of a phase II study of ripretinib vs. sunitinib in chinese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor
Presenter: Jian Li
Session: Poster session 06
1760P - Impact of adjuvant imatinib on recurrence for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated GISTs: An analysis of the RECKGIST cohort from the French NETSARC+ network
Presenter: Vincent Hautefeuille
Session: Poster session 06
1761P - Clinical description and development of a prognosis score for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated GISTs in the RECKGIST cohort: A retrospective study from the French NETSARC+ network
Presenter: Charlotte Cuvelier
Session: Poster session 06