Abstract 1760P
Background
Interest of adjuvant imatinib, the standard of care for resected high risk KIT mutated GIST, is unknown for NF1-GISTs. The aim of this study was to determine whether adjuvant imatinib or surveillance had an impact on relapse.
Methods
This retrospective study included consecutive NF1 patients with operated localized GIST, from 2008-2023 in 25 NETSARC+ centers. Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the LogRank test. To address potential bias, a 1:1 propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) matching were performed.
Results
114 patients operated patients were included. Follow up was 6.1 years, median treatment duration was 21 months (IQR 6-36). 50% of patients relapsed in the adjuvant group (AG, n=22) and 6.5% in the surveillance group (SG, n=92). Unmatched analysis of the 10-years relapse free survival (10y-RFS) showed a worse 10y-RFS of the AG: 47.9% (CI95: 23.8-68.6) vs 91.7% (CI95: 80.8-96.5), p<0.001. Groups were similar for gender (p=0.63), age at inclusion (p=0.31), location (intestinal vs gastric, p=0.99), rupture (p=0.16), mutational status (KIT/PDGFRa mutation yes vs no, p=0.20) but different for year of inclusion (p=0.02), largest size (69 vs 48 mm, p=0.03), mitotic count (7 vs 5 mitoses/5mm2, p=0.003), Miettinen high (58.8% vs 12.7%, p<0.001), Joensuu high (90.5% vs 44.8%, p=0.002) and RECKGIST C (40% vs 9.9%, p=0.001) scores. IPTW did not properly match patients, as AG remained of worse prognosis. Best 1:1 matching was only possible for 15 patients of each group. After matching, there was no difference for year of inclusion (p=0.14), location (gastric 13.3% vs 20%, p=0.99), mutational status (KIT/PDGFRa 0% vs 7%, p=0.48), largest size (76 vs 53 mm, p=0.48), mitotic count (8 vs 5/5mm2, p=0.86) and RECKGIST score C (31% vs 20%, p=0.88) for AG and SG respectively. 10y-RFS were similar between both groups (LogRank, p=0.34), 60.0% (CI95: 31.8-79.7) and 67.9% (CI95: 28.2-88.8) respectively.
Conclusions
There was no sign of efficacy of adjuvant imatinib after surgery after matching, consistent with its known low efficacy in non KIT/PDGFRa mutated GIST, strengthening ESMO guidelines to avoid adjuvant treatment in NF1-GIST.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
CHU Amiens Picardie.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V. Hautefeuille: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Merck, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AAA, Ipsen, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Deciphera, Esteve. B. Verret: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Lilly, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Owkins, AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Watson: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Deeciphera, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Deciphera, Boerhinger Ingelheim. N. Penel: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research grant for clinical trials in sarcoma filed: Bayer HealthCare. F. Ghiringhelli: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, Merck Serono, MSD. M. Muller: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Servier. D. Tougeron: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, MSD, Roche, Servier, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Bayer; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors: Federation francophone de cancerologie digestive. O. Bouche: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Apmonia Therapeutics, Deciphera, Astellas, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Pierre Fabre, Bayer. M. Brahmi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, PharmaMar, Deciphera. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1352P - Real-world second-line outcomes of NSCLC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy
Presenter: Marco Russano
Session: Poster session 06
1353P - Efficacy and safety of docetaxel in combination with nintedanib or ramucirumab following immune checkpoint-Inhibitor treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Konstantinos Ferentinos
Session: Poster session 06
1354P - Retrospective audit to determine the effect of antibiotic therapy on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in stage IV NSCLC
Presenter: Deevyashali Parekh
Session: Poster session 06
1356P - Transcriptomic inflammatory profiling of non-small cell lung cancer: Insights from a 7-gene expression analysis
Presenter: Elba Marin
Session: Poster session 06
1357P - Multicenter phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine plus necitumumab in patients with unresectable, advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma who have progressed on or after initial treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy: WJOG14120L NESSIE study
Presenter: Hiroshige Yoshioka
Session: Poster session 06
1358P - Plinabulin/docetaxel versus docetaxel in survival benefits of 2L/3L EGFR wild-type NSCLC after platinum regimens (DUBLIN-3): A randomized phase III trial
Presenter: Trevor Feinstein
Session: Poster session 06
1359P - Lack of Abscopal effect and radiotherapy-induced lymphocyte depletion in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with atezolizumab and radiotherapy
Presenter: Alexander Meisel
Session: Poster session 06
1361P - The Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Brain Prognostic Index (SRS-BPI): A novel prognostic index for lung cancer patients with brain metastases eligible for SRS
Presenter: Andreas Koulouris
Session: Poster session 06