Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 06

1758P - Real-world efficacy of imatinib in patients with advanced GIST: The LRG registry

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 06

Topics

Patient Education and Advocacy;  Clinical Research;  Cancer Registries;  Targeted Therapy;  Molecular Oncology;  Genetic and Genomic Testing

Tumour Site

GIST;  Gastrointestinal Cancers

Presenters

Gahyun Gim

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1031-S1061. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1610

Authors

G. Gim1, J. Call2, D. Evans2, S. Rothschild3, A. Victor1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, University of Rochester Cancer Center, 14642 - Rochester/US
  • 2 Research, The Life Raft Group, 07470 - Wayne/US
  • 3 Executive Director, The Life Raft Group, 07470 - Wayne/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1758P

Background

Imatinib (IM) has been the standard treatment for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) for over two decades, showing a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of approximately two years in pivotal trials. We conducted an updated review of one of the largest registries to assess IM's real-world effectiveness in advanced/metastatic GIST patients, emphasizing molecular subtypes.

Methods

Life Raft Group (LRG) patient registry data including demographics, tumor locations, mutational status, and treatment history was reviewed.

Results

A total of 2,661 patients diagnosed with GIST were identified, of which 1,541 patients (57.9%) had known mutation status. We evaluated 798 advanced/metastatic GISTs by predicted IM sensitivity (see table). While in the whole cohort mPFS was 31.2 months (95% CI 27.6-36.7), the mPFS in the IM-sensitive cohort (n=559) was significantly higher at 42 months (95% CI 36.6 – 53.9) compared to 18.8 months (95% CI 10.9 – 29.5) in the IM-intermediate cohort (n=119) and 15 months (95% CI 10.0 – 22.1) in the IM-insensitive cohort (n=120). The median overall survival (mOS) in 533 advanced/metastatic KIT exon 11 patients was 12.6 years (95% CI 11.1-14.3). The rate of extra-abdominal metastasis in 364 advanced GIST patients with KIT/PDGFRA mutations and abdominal primaries was 17% (n=61), with 47 (13%) reporting thoracic metastasis and 28 (8%) reporting bone/spine metastasis. Only one patient reported a brain metastasis (0.2%). Table: 1758P

PFS and OS with 1st line IM

Sensitivity All patients PFS OS
N % N mPFS PFS - CI 95% mOS OS - CI 95%
IM-Sensitive 1048 68.0% 559 42.0 36.6-53.9 145.0 133.0-169.0
KIT ex 11 979 63.5% 533 41.3 36.0-52.9 151.3 133.0-171.4
KIT ex 13 23 1.5% 13 64.5 28.3-NA 136.0 84.9-NA
PDGFRA ex 12 15 1.0% 5 141 21.3-NA NA NA-NA
PDGFRA ex 18 non-D842V 31 2.0% 8 34.7 15.0-NA 48.5 41.9-NA
IM-Intermediate (KIT ex 9) 182 11.8% 119 18.8 10.9-29.5 95.4 70.8-114.4
IM-Insensitive 311 20.2% 120 15.0 10.0-22.1 132.0 102.0-NA
Wildtype 56 3.6% 27 15.6 9.6-32.0 94.7 74.5-129.3
PDGFRA D842V 63 4.1% 11 5.6 2.2-NA 80.2 38.5-NA
NF1 27 1.8% 8 6.7 3.0-NA NA 21.0-NA
KIT ex 17 12 0.8% 5 3.2 1.0-NA NA 20.2-NA
SDHx 153 9.9% 69 15.0 10.5-31.0 208.5 208.5-NA

Conclusions

Our study shows that initial IM treatment may achieve a mPFS of over three years for IM-sensitive mutations, with a mOS >10 years. Additionally, 17% developed extra-abdominal metastases, mainly to the thorax and bones. This highlights the need to integrate mutation status and clinical-genomic data from large cohorts into GIST therapeutic development and clinical counseling.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The Life Raft Group.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

J. Call, D. Evans, S. Rothschild: Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Sponsor/Funding and Educational Grants: Blueprint, Cogent Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Genentech, IDRx, Novartis, Pfizer, Theseus. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.