Abstract 1362P
Background
In aNSCLC, pretreatment CTs help determine TNM stage, an important prognostic factor in treatment decisions, as well as determination of clinical trial eligibility/stratification. However, CTs contain prognostic features beyond TNM stage that are not easily quantifiable or reproducible. We examine an imaging-based artificial intelligence algorithm to predict overall survival (OS) compared to TNM staging.
Methods
IPRO, a fully automated deep learning system extracting 5,341 features from chest CT (including tumor burden, and body/cardiovascular composition), was trained on an independent dataset to generate mortality risk scores. We retrospectively evaluate IPRO compared to TNM stage to predict OS from 2,894 subjects diagnosed with aNSCLC at 17 cancer centers in Alberta from 2008 - 2017. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods are used to estimate covariate effects on OS including a model stratified by stage. We evaluate Harrell’s c-index and AIC as measures of goodness of fit comparing models with IPRO, TNM stage, and IPRO + stage (full model). Smaller values for AIC and larger values of the c-index indicate better models.
Results
Median OS was 4.3 months, 80.3% of patients were stage IV at diagnosis, and 52.6% were male. Hazard ratios for OS by IPRO within stage were 1.39 (IIIB) and 1.34 (IV), suggesting IPRO associations were similar by stage group. The c-index for IPRO was larger than for TNM staging. Removing IPRO from the full model resulted in a larger deterioration in AIC than removal of TNM staging.
Conclusions
IPRO provides better discrimination of OS compared to TNM stage based on the c-index. The addition of stage in the full model negligibly improves goodness of fit. This suggests IPRO is a better predictor of OS than stage in this population and may provide greater utility as a prognostic factor in clinical research. Future analyses will include biomarker status and incorporation of other anatomic regions into the model. Table: 1362P
Summary of goodness of fit statistics
Model | C-index | AIC |
Stage (IIIB vs IV) | 0.54 | 39461.40 |
IPRO | 0.60 | 39299.62 |
Full model (IPRO + stage) | 0.61 | 39226.61 |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Altis Labs, Inc.
Funding
Digital Supercluster, Altis Labs, Inc.
Disclosure
O.F. Khan: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck, Gilead, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Knight Therapeutics, AstraZeneca. J. Riskas:Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. S.A. Haider, O. Samorodova, J. Hennessy, V. Sivan, D. Shah: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. A. Mitchell: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Altis Labs, Inc. F. Baldauf-Lenschen: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc. S. Raman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Knight Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bayer, AstraZeneca, Tersera, Sanofi, Verity Pharma. N.B. Leighl: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, CME/independent lectures: MSD, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent lectures: Novartis, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent CME lecture: BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Independent CME lectures: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Janssen, Inivata/NeoGenomics, Novartis; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lectures: AstraZeneca; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lecture: Janssen, MSD, Sanofi, Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1741P - Ethically-sensitive clinical scenarios in adult patients with sarcomas: A real-world single-institution survey and a classification attempt
Presenter: Paolo G. Casali
Session: Poster session 06
1742P - Factors influencing awareness of patient associations in sarcoma: A multicentric cross-sectional study
Presenter: Pau Mascaró Baselga
Session: Poster session 06
1743P - A phase II study of fruquintinib in the 1L or 2L treatment of unresectable metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
Presenter: Zhiguo Luo
Session: Poster session 06
1745P - How to optimize the response with trabectedin in soft tissue sarcomas? Data from a high-volume center
Presenter: Sebastian Diaz
Session: Poster session 06
1746P - Real-world characterization of patients with advanced or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) in Japan in MASTER KEY project
Presenter: Kenji Tsuchihashi
Session: Poster session 06
1747P - Changes in global health status (GHS) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated with first line palliative chemotherapy: Primary outcomes from the HOLISTIC study
Presenter: Evelyne Roets
Session: Poster session 06
1748P - A prospective, phase II study of tislelizumab administered in combination with eribulin and anlotinib for patients (pts) with advanced adult oft tissue sarcoma (TEASTS)
Presenter: Xi Guo
Session: Poster session 06
1749P - Vertebral MRI in the screening for bone metastasis in myxoid liposarcoma: Is it justified?
Presenter: Tania Moussa
Session: Poster session 06
1750P - Incidence of cardiotoxicity after high cumulative dose of anthracyclines in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Gale Rizzae Mercado Alcala
Session: Poster session 06
1751P - Clinical and survival data of 336 myxoid liposarcoma patients: The Gustave Roussy experience
Presenter: Tarek Assi
Session: Poster session 06