Abstract 1362P
Background
In aNSCLC, pretreatment CTs help determine TNM stage, an important prognostic factor in treatment decisions, as well as determination of clinical trial eligibility/stratification. However, CTs contain prognostic features beyond TNM stage that are not easily quantifiable or reproducible. We examine an imaging-based artificial intelligence algorithm to predict overall survival (OS) compared to TNM staging.
Methods
IPRO, a fully automated deep learning system extracting 5,341 features from chest CT (including tumor burden, and body/cardiovascular composition), was trained on an independent dataset to generate mortality risk scores. We retrospectively evaluate IPRO compared to TNM stage to predict OS from 2,894 subjects diagnosed with aNSCLC at 17 cancer centers in Alberta from 2008 - 2017. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods are used to estimate covariate effects on OS including a model stratified by stage. We evaluate Harrell’s c-index and AIC as measures of goodness of fit comparing models with IPRO, TNM stage, and IPRO + stage (full model). Smaller values for AIC and larger values of the c-index indicate better models.
Results
Median OS was 4.3 months, 80.3% of patients were stage IV at diagnosis, and 52.6% were male. Hazard ratios for OS by IPRO within stage were 1.39 (IIIB) and 1.34 (IV), suggesting IPRO associations were similar by stage group. The c-index for IPRO was larger than for TNM staging. Removing IPRO from the full model resulted in a larger deterioration in AIC than removal of TNM staging.
Conclusions
IPRO provides better discrimination of OS compared to TNM stage based on the c-index. The addition of stage in the full model negligibly improves goodness of fit. This suggests IPRO is a better predictor of OS than stage in this population and may provide greater utility as a prognostic factor in clinical research. Future analyses will include biomarker status and incorporation of other anatomic regions into the model. Table: 1362P
Summary of goodness of fit statistics
Model | C-index | AIC |
Stage (IIIB vs IV) | 0.54 | 39461.40 |
IPRO | 0.60 | 39299.62 |
Full model (IPRO + stage) | 0.61 | 39226.61 |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Altis Labs, Inc.
Funding
Digital Supercluster, Altis Labs, Inc.
Disclosure
O.F. Khan: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck, Gilead, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Knight Therapeutics, AstraZeneca. J. Riskas:Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. S.A. Haider, O. Samorodova, J. Hennessy, V. Sivan, D. Shah: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. A. Mitchell: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Altis Labs, Inc. F. Baldauf-Lenschen: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc. S. Raman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Knight Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bayer, AstraZeneca, Tersera, Sanofi, Verity Pharma. N.B. Leighl: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, CME/independent lectures: MSD, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent lectures: Novartis, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent CME lecture: BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Independent CME lectures: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Janssen, Inivata/NeoGenomics, Novartis; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lectures: AstraZeneca; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lecture: Janssen, MSD, Sanofi, Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1763P - Initial tumour size and residual mitotic count post-neoadjuvant imatinib linked to shorter relapse-free survival in GIST patients
Presenter: Javier Pozas Perez
Session: Poster session 06
1764P - Role of PIK3CA as a predictive biomarker in metastatic, imatinib-resistant GIST: A ct-DNA substudy of the VOYAGER trial
Presenter: Lennart Schardt
Session: Poster session 06
1765P - Second-line targeted therapy patterns and outcomes of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A prospective, multicentered real-world study
Presenter: Xinhua Zhang
Session: Poster session 06
1766P - Updated results of the RINGSIDE phase II trial and open-label extension of AL102 for treatment of desmoid tumors
Presenter: Bernd Kasper
Session: Poster session 06
1767P - Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in symptomatic desmoid tumor
Presenter: Kjetil Boye
Session: Poster session 06
1768P - Desmoid tumors: Experience of a Spanish reference center
Presenter: Ana Gutierrez Ortiz
Session: Poster session 06
1769P - Safety and efficacy with vimseltinib in patients (pts) with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) who received no prior anti–colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) therapy: Ongoing phase II study
Presenter: Cesar Serrano
Session: Poster session 06
1771P - Blessed: Expanded yccess for DeltaRex-G in vivo gene therapy for sarcoma, pancreas and breast cancer (NCT04091295) and other solid malignancies (IND# 19130)
Presenter: Sant Chawla
Session: Poster session 06
1772P - Phosphoproteomic biomarker for afatinib response stratification in advanced chordoma
Presenter: Christoph Stange
Session: Poster session 06