Abstract 1362P
Background
In aNSCLC, pretreatment CTs help determine TNM stage, an important prognostic factor in treatment decisions, as well as determination of clinical trial eligibility/stratification. However, CTs contain prognostic features beyond TNM stage that are not easily quantifiable or reproducible. We examine an imaging-based artificial intelligence algorithm to predict overall survival (OS) compared to TNM staging.
Methods
IPRO, a fully automated deep learning system extracting 5,341 features from chest CT (including tumor burden, and body/cardiovascular composition), was trained on an independent dataset to generate mortality risk scores. We retrospectively evaluate IPRO compared to TNM stage to predict OS from 2,894 subjects diagnosed with aNSCLC at 17 cancer centers in Alberta from 2008 - 2017. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods are used to estimate covariate effects on OS including a model stratified by stage. We evaluate Harrell’s c-index and AIC as measures of goodness of fit comparing models with IPRO, TNM stage, and IPRO + stage (full model). Smaller values for AIC and larger values of the c-index indicate better models.
Results
Median OS was 4.3 months, 80.3% of patients were stage IV at diagnosis, and 52.6% were male. Hazard ratios for OS by IPRO within stage were 1.39 (IIIB) and 1.34 (IV), suggesting IPRO associations were similar by stage group. The c-index for IPRO was larger than for TNM staging. Removing IPRO from the full model resulted in a larger deterioration in AIC than removal of TNM staging.
Conclusions
IPRO provides better discrimination of OS compared to TNM stage based on the c-index. The addition of stage in the full model negligibly improves goodness of fit. This suggests IPRO is a better predictor of OS than stage in this population and may provide greater utility as a prognostic factor in clinical research. Future analyses will include biomarker status and incorporation of other anatomic regions into the model. Table: 1362P
Summary of goodness of fit statistics
Model | C-index | AIC |
Stage (IIIB vs IV) | 0.54 | 39461.40 |
IPRO | 0.60 | 39299.62 |
Full model (IPRO + stage) | 0.61 | 39226.61 |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Altis Labs, Inc.
Funding
Digital Supercluster, Altis Labs, Inc.
Disclosure
O.F. Khan: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck, Gilead, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Knight Therapeutics, AstraZeneca. J. Riskas:Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. S.A. Haider, O. Samorodova, J. Hennessy, V. Sivan, D. Shah: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. A. Mitchell: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Altis Labs, Inc. F. Baldauf-Lenschen: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc. S. Raman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Knight Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bayer, AstraZeneca, Tersera, Sanofi, Verity Pharma. N.B. Leighl: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, CME/independent lectures: MSD, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent lectures: Novartis, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent CME lecture: BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Independent CME lectures: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Janssen, Inivata/NeoGenomics, Novartis; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lectures: AstraZeneca; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lecture: Janssen, MSD, Sanofi, Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1373P - Measuring PFS in clinical trials and observational studies of patients with NSCLC: A scoping review
Presenter: Marjon Verschueren
Session: Poster session 06
1374P - Analysis of evolution of patient reported side effects during treatment for advanced NSCLC
Presenter: Helena Linardou
Session: Poster session 06
1375P - Sequential ctDNA profiling in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: An interim analysis of the COPE randomized study
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster session 06
Resources:
Abstract
1376P - Early detection of disease progression in NSCLC patients undergoing immunotherapy through ctDNA analysis
Presenter: Virginia Calvo de Juan
Session: Poster session 06
1377P - Association of anatomic proximity of brain parenchymal metastasis to the CSF space and upfront stereotactic radiosurgery to subsequent leptomeningeal metastasis development in brain metastatic NSCLC
Presenter: Shoaib Bashir
Session: Poster session 06
Resources:
Abstract
1378P - Improvements in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer survival differ by race in the US
Presenter: Oluwaseun Ayoade
Session: Poster session 06
1379P - c-Met protein overexpression and telisotuzumab vedotin efficacy by biopsy age, type, and region in the LUMINOSITY phase II study
Presenter: Jair Bar
Session: Poster session 06
1380P - PK/PD analysis of pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab in NSCLC patients: The PIONeeR trial
Presenter: Joseph Ciccolini
Session: Poster session 06
1381P - Comparison between standard dose 75mg/m<sup>2</sup> and fixed dose at 50mg of cisplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients in term of response rate and toxicity profile
Presenter: Maher Salamoon
Session: Poster session 06
1382P - Vebreltinib efficacy and safety in NSCLC patients with METex14 skipping mutations
Presenter: Maurice Pérol
Session: Poster session 06