Abstract 1362P
Background
In aNSCLC, pretreatment CTs help determine TNM stage, an important prognostic factor in treatment decisions, as well as determination of clinical trial eligibility/stratification. However, CTs contain prognostic features beyond TNM stage that are not easily quantifiable or reproducible. We examine an imaging-based artificial intelligence algorithm to predict overall survival (OS) compared to TNM staging.
Methods
IPRO, a fully automated deep learning system extracting 5,341 features from chest CT (including tumor burden, and body/cardiovascular composition), was trained on an independent dataset to generate mortality risk scores. We retrospectively evaluate IPRO compared to TNM stage to predict OS from 2,894 subjects diagnosed with aNSCLC at 17 cancer centers in Alberta from 2008 - 2017. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods are used to estimate covariate effects on OS including a model stratified by stage. We evaluate Harrell’s c-index and AIC as measures of goodness of fit comparing models with IPRO, TNM stage, and IPRO + stage (full model). Smaller values for AIC and larger values of the c-index indicate better models.
Results
Median OS was 4.3 months, 80.3% of patients were stage IV at diagnosis, and 52.6% were male. Hazard ratios for OS by IPRO within stage were 1.39 (IIIB) and 1.34 (IV), suggesting IPRO associations were similar by stage group. The c-index for IPRO was larger than for TNM staging. Removing IPRO from the full model resulted in a larger deterioration in AIC than removal of TNM staging.
Conclusions
IPRO provides better discrimination of OS compared to TNM stage based on the c-index. The addition of stage in the full model negligibly improves goodness of fit. This suggests IPRO is a better predictor of OS than stage in this population and may provide greater utility as a prognostic factor in clinical research. Future analyses will include biomarker status and incorporation of other anatomic regions into the model. Table: 1362P
Summary of goodness of fit statistics
Model | C-index | AIC |
Stage (IIIB vs IV) | 0.54 | 39461.40 |
IPRO | 0.60 | 39299.62 |
Full model (IPRO + stage) | 0.61 | 39226.61 |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Altis Labs, Inc.
Funding
Digital Supercluster, Altis Labs, Inc.
Disclosure
O.F. Khan: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck, Gilead, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Knight Therapeutics, AstraZeneca. J. Riskas:Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. S.A. Haider, O. Samorodova, J. Hennessy, V. Sivan, D. Shah: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Altis Labs, Inc. A. Mitchell: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Altis Labs, Inc. F. Baldauf-Lenschen: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Altis Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Altis Labs, Inc. S. Raman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Knight Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bayer, AstraZeneca, Tersera, Sanofi, Verity Pharma. N.B. Leighl: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, CME/independent lectures: MSD, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent lectures: Novartis, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, independent CME lecture: BeiGene; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Independent CME lectures: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Janssen, Inivata/NeoGenomics, Novartis; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lectures: AstraZeneca; Other, Travel funding to deliver independent CME lecture: Janssen, MSD, Sanofi, Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1731P - Phase II study of the CDK2/4/6 inhibitor TQB3616 capsules in patients with dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS)
Presenter: Jing Chen
Session: Poster session 06
1732P - Primary pulmonary sarcoma: A EURACAN project
Presenter: Stephane Collaud
Session: Poster session 06
1733P - Update on gallant: A phase II study using metronomic gemcitabine, doxorubicin and docetaxel plus nivolumab in previously treated sarcoma
Presenter: Neal Chawla
Session: Poster session 06
1734P - Evaluation of nivolumab in cutaneous angiosarcoma management: The ANGIOCHECK study
Presenter: Yasuhiro Fujisawa
Session: Poster session 06
1735P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib in patients with advanced sarcomas (SINANLOSARC): A single-centre, single-arm, phase II trial
Presenter: Zengjun Liu
Session: Poster session 06
Resources:
Abstract
1736P - An open label phase IIa study evaluating the preliminary efficacy of intratumoural tigilanol tiglate (TT) in advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS)
Presenter: Edmund Bartlett
Session: Poster session 06
1737P - A comparison of the risk prediction models sarculator and PERSARC in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk wall
Presenter: Marthe Kobbeltvedt
Session: Poster session 06
1738P - Results from the conference on challenges in sarcoma (CCS) 2024
Presenter: Christian Rothermundt
Session: Poster session 06
1739P - Linnovate: A phase I/II study of safety/efficacy using lurbinectedin combined with ipilimumab and nivolumab for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (NCT05876715) - Interim analysis of phase I part
Presenter: Erlinda Gordon
Session: Poster session 06
1740P - Surufatinib combined with gemcitabine in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients failed with anthracyclines chemotherapy or monotherapy post-anlotinib progression: A multi-center, phase II trial
Presenter: Yuhong Zhou
Session: Poster session 06