Abstract 1121P
Background
In current clinical practice, LDH level is widely used as decision tool between anti-PD1 monotherapy (LDH low) versus combination of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 (LDH high). However, approximately only 50% of LDH low patients respond to anti-PD1. In stage III melanoma patients (generally LDH low) the interferon (IFN)g signature has been identified as strongest baseline marker for response to neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. Therefore, we addressed the question whether an IFNg signature could serve as additional biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low advanced melanoma patients.
Methods
Advanced melanoma patients participating in biobank study in the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy between April 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively identified. The IFNg-signature was analyzed on baseline paraffine tumor biopsies using mRNA sequencing. The cutoff between IFNg-high and IFNg-low cohorts was calculated using ROC curves on the objective response (OR).
Results
Forty-nine patients were included: the majority had cutaneous (98%) and BRAF wild type (53%) melanoma and stage M1c disease (39%, AJCC 8th edition). Patients with a high IFNg-signature at baseline showed a higher response rate to anti-PD1 (OR 86% vs 43%; p=0.016) and an improved progression free survival (p=0.046) and overall survival (p=0.064). Table: 1121P
IFNg low (n=46) | IFNg high (n=19) | |
Objective response | 15 (43%) | 12 (86%) |
median PFS (m, IQR) | 7.0 (2.0, 23.5) | 25.5 (7.0, 72.0) |
median OS (m, IQR) | 23.0 (12.0, 76.0) | 60.5 (37.0, 76.8) |
24 m PFS (%) | 27% (CI: 15.4-46.8) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
60 m PFS (%) | 15% (CI: 6.7-33.4) | 43% (CI: 23.4-78.5) |
24 m OS (%) | 46% (CI: 31.9-65.6) | 78% (CI: 59.8-100) |
60 m OS (%) | 31% (CI: 19.3-51.3) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
PFS, progression free survival; OS, overall survival; m, months; IQR, interquartile range; CI, 95% confidence interval.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that the IFNg-signature could become a biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low patients directing towards anti-PD1 monotherapy (in IFNg high patients) versus combination therapy, with either anti-LAG3 or anti-CTLA-4 in IFNg low patients. However, confirmation in larger cohorts and in other combination therapies is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Christian Blank's group.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P. Dimitriadis: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, will receive some possible revenues if the IFN-γ signature is being developed as clinical companion diagnostic: Signature oncology. D. Peeper: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest, o-founder, shareholder, and advisor: Immagene. C.U. Blank: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Third Rock Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Immagene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, intention to develop IFN signature algorithm: NewCo, no name yet; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, NanoString, 4SC; Other, pending patent: WO 2021/177822 A1. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1109P - Second-line pembrolizumab (pembro) in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Long-term follow-up of the phase I KEYNOTE-151 study
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster session 13
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13