Abstract 1121P
Background
In current clinical practice, LDH level is widely used as decision tool between anti-PD1 monotherapy (LDH low) versus combination of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 (LDH high). However, approximately only 50% of LDH low patients respond to anti-PD1. In stage III melanoma patients (generally LDH low) the interferon (IFN)g signature has been identified as strongest baseline marker for response to neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. Therefore, we addressed the question whether an IFNg signature could serve as additional biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low advanced melanoma patients.
Methods
Advanced melanoma patients participating in biobank study in the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy between April 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively identified. The IFNg-signature was analyzed on baseline paraffine tumor biopsies using mRNA sequencing. The cutoff between IFNg-high and IFNg-low cohorts was calculated using ROC curves on the objective response (OR).
Results
Forty-nine patients were included: the majority had cutaneous (98%) and BRAF wild type (53%) melanoma and stage M1c disease (39%, AJCC 8th edition). Patients with a high IFNg-signature at baseline showed a higher response rate to anti-PD1 (OR 86% vs 43%; p=0.016) and an improved progression free survival (p=0.046) and overall survival (p=0.064). Table: 1121P
IFNg low (n=46) | IFNg high (n=19) | |
Objective response | 15 (43%) | 12 (86%) |
median PFS (m, IQR) | 7.0 (2.0, 23.5) | 25.5 (7.0, 72.0) |
median OS (m, IQR) | 23.0 (12.0, 76.0) | 60.5 (37.0, 76.8) |
24 m PFS (%) | 27% (CI: 15.4-46.8) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
60 m PFS (%) | 15% (CI: 6.7-33.4) | 43% (CI: 23.4-78.5) |
24 m OS (%) | 46% (CI: 31.9-65.6) | 78% (CI: 59.8-100) |
60 m OS (%) | 31% (CI: 19.3-51.3) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
PFS, progression free survival; OS, overall survival; m, months; IQR, interquartile range; CI, 95% confidence interval.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that the IFNg-signature could become a biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low patients directing towards anti-PD1 monotherapy (in IFNg high patients) versus combination therapy, with either anti-LAG3 or anti-CTLA-4 in IFNg low patients. However, confirmation in larger cohorts and in other combination therapies is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Christian Blank's group.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P. Dimitriadis: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, will receive some possible revenues if the IFN-γ signature is being developed as clinical companion diagnostic: Signature oncology. D. Peeper: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest, o-founder, shareholder, and advisor: Immagene. C.U. Blank: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Third Rock Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Immagene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, intention to develop IFN signature algorithm: NewCo, no name yet; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, NanoString, 4SC; Other, pending patent: WO 2021/177822 A1. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1171P - Evaluation of the transcriptomic presence of tumor associated antigens (TAAs) from antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and PD-L1 in melanoma: Options for new clinical opportunities
Presenter: Jorge Bartolome
Session: Poster session 13
1172P - Analysis of the microbiome of metastatic melanoma patients with complete response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Marin Golcic
Session: Poster session 13
1173P - NRAS mutation as an independent prognostic factor for resectable Chinese acral melanoma
Presenter: Yu Xu
Session: Poster session 13
1174P - Sex differences in advanced melanoma in Spain: Results from the prospective real-world study GEM 1801
Presenter: Eva Muñoz Couselo
Session: Poster session 13
1175P - Return to work after neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma patients
Presenter: Judith Lijnsvelt
Session: Poster session 13
1176P - Planned drug holidays during immunotherapy in advanced and metastatic melanoma patients: A nation-wide study
Presenter: Anna Czarnecka
Session: Poster session 13
1177P - Assessment of tumour burden reduction per photography vs magnetic resonance imaging in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma receiving sonidegib 200 mg
Presenter: Ralf Gutzmer
Session: Poster session 13
1178P - Melanoma incidence rises for pediatrics: 15-year nationwide retrospective cohort study in Korea (2004-2019)
Presenter: Jisu Oh
Session: Poster session 13
1179P - The underestimated skin cancer risk after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis of 147154 patients
Presenter: Amr Ehab El-Qushayri
Session: Poster session 13