Abstract 1109P
Background
At the 3-y follow-up of KEYNOTE-151 (NCT02821000), second-line pembro showed manageable safety and clinically meaningful antitumor activity in Chinese pts with advanced melanoma. Results from more than 5 y of follow-up are presented.
Methods
Adults who had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, who were of Chinese descent, and whose disease progressed with first-line therapy received pembro 2 mg/kg IV Q3W for ≤35 cycles (∼2 y) or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts with SD or better who discontinued pembro could receive a second course of pembro (≤17 cycles) upon disease progression. Primary end points were safety and tolerability and ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points were DOR and PFS per RECIST v1.1 and irRECIST by BICR, ORR per irRECIST by BICR, and OS. Safety and OS were analyzed in pts who received ≥1 dose of pembro. Other efficacy end points were assessed in pts who received ≥1 dose of pembro and had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 at baseline.
Results
One hundred three pts received pembro (102 with measurable disease at baseline). Median age was 52 y, 57.3% of the pts were female, 51.5% had PD-L1 positive disease, and 14.6% had mucosal melanoma. Median follow-up at data cutoff (Nov 30, 2022) was 73.2 mo (IQR, 67.6-74.8). No new safety signals were reported. Grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 12.6% of pts; no pts died of treatment-related AEs. ORR per RECIST v1.1 was 17.6% (95% CI, 10.8-26.4; 1 CR, 17 PR); DCR was 38.2% (95% CI, 28.8-48.4). Median DOR per RECIST v1.1 was 13.8 mo (range, 2.7-69.4+); an estimated 37.7% of pts had DOR ≥60 mo. Median PFS was 2.8 mo (95% CI, 2.7-3.5); 60-mo PFS was 5.0%. One additional pt had PR per irRECIST (ORR, 18.6%; 95% CI, 11.6-27.6). Median OS was 13.2 mo (95% CI, 10.4-16.5); 60-mo OS was 13.4%. One pt with PR as the best overall response per RECIST v1.1 received second-course pembro.
Conclusions
After more than 5 y of follow-up, second-line pembro continued to show manageable safety and clinically meaningful antitumor activity in Chinese pts with advanced melanoma. These results support the continued use of pembro in this population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02821000.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Jemimah Walker, PhD, and Rob Steger, PhD, of ApotheCom (Yardley, PA, USA).
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Funding
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Disclosure
L. Si: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Novartis, Oriengene, Roche, Shanghai Junshi Biosciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Novartis, Shanghai Junshi Biosciences. S. Diede: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck. S.S. Chen, H. Hu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: MSD. J. Guo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Simcere, Shanghai Junshi Biosciences, Oriengene. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1100P - Open-label non-randomized phase IB study to characterize the safety, tolerability and recommended dose of tinostamustin in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma (ENIGMA)
Presenter: Markus Joerger
Session: Poster session 13
1101P - The effect of LNS8801 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with treatment-refractory cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Jordi Rodon
Session: Poster session 13
1102P - Evaluation of surrogate endpoints for overall survival within the RELATIVITY-047 trial
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster session 13
1103P - Nivolumab (NIVO) plus relatlimab (RELA) vs NIVO in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: 2-year subgroup analyses from RELATIVITY-047
Presenter: Georgina Long
Session: Poster session 13
1104P - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic or non-resectable melanoma after failure of adjuvant anti-PD1 treatment: A EUMelareg real-world evidence study
Presenter: Michael Weichenthal
Session: Poster session 13
1105P - First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients previously treated with adjuvant systemic therapy
Presenter: Katarzyna Kozak
Session: Poster session 13
1106P - Anti-PD-1 (PD1) monotherapy or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 for metastatic melanoma (MM) patients (pts) with liver metastases (mets)
Presenter: Ines Pires da Silva
Session: Poster session 13
1107P - BRAF mutation status does not impact outcomes with tebentafusp in advanced cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Alexander Shoushtari
Session: Poster session 13
1108P - Outcomes of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma after cessation of immunotherapy following complete response or toxicities
Presenter: Nur Sakinah Zulkifli
Session: Poster session 13