Abstract 1121P
Background
In current clinical practice, LDH level is widely used as decision tool between anti-PD1 monotherapy (LDH low) versus combination of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 (LDH high). However, approximately only 50% of LDH low patients respond to anti-PD1. In stage III melanoma patients (generally LDH low) the interferon (IFN)g signature has been identified as strongest baseline marker for response to neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. Therefore, we addressed the question whether an IFNg signature could serve as additional biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low advanced melanoma patients.
Methods
Advanced melanoma patients participating in biobank study in the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy between April 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively identified. The IFNg-signature was analyzed on baseline paraffine tumor biopsies using mRNA sequencing. The cutoff between IFNg-high and IFNg-low cohorts was calculated using ROC curves on the objective response (OR).
Results
Forty-nine patients were included: the majority had cutaneous (98%) and BRAF wild type (53%) melanoma and stage M1c disease (39%, AJCC 8th edition). Patients with a high IFNg-signature at baseline showed a higher response rate to anti-PD1 (OR 86% vs 43%; p=0.016) and an improved progression free survival (p=0.046) and overall survival (p=0.064). Table: 1121P
IFNg low (n=46) | IFNg high (n=19) | |
Objective response | 15 (43%) | 12 (86%) |
median PFS (m, IQR) | 7.0 (2.0, 23.5) | 25.5 (7.0, 72.0) |
median OS (m, IQR) | 23.0 (12.0, 76.0) | 60.5 (37.0, 76.8) |
24 m PFS (%) | 27% (CI: 15.4-46.8) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
60 m PFS (%) | 15% (CI: 6.7-33.4) | 43% (CI: 23.4-78.5) |
24 m OS (%) | 46% (CI: 31.9-65.6) | 78% (CI: 59.8-100) |
60 m OS (%) | 31% (CI: 19.3-51.3) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
PFS, progression free survival; OS, overall survival; m, months; IQR, interquartile range; CI, 95% confidence interval.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that the IFNg-signature could become a biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low patients directing towards anti-PD1 monotherapy (in IFNg high patients) versus combination therapy, with either anti-LAG3 or anti-CTLA-4 in IFNg low patients. However, confirmation in larger cohorts and in other combination therapies is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Christian Blank's group.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P. Dimitriadis: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, will receive some possible revenues if the IFN-γ signature is being developed as clinical companion diagnostic: Signature oncology. D. Peeper: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest, o-founder, shareholder, and advisor: Immagene. C.U. Blank: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Third Rock Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Immagene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, intention to develop IFN signature algorithm: NewCo, no name yet; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, NanoString, 4SC; Other, pending patent: WO 2021/177822 A1. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1119P - Stage IIIA melanoma with isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes: Time for reviewing the AJCC v8 classification
Presenter: Teresa Amaral
Session: Poster session 13
1120P - Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model to predict recurrence-free survival and melanoma-specific survival in patients with melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy
Presenter: Robert Stassen
Session: Poster session 13
1122P - Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and systemic inflammatory index as prognostic biomarkers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune checkpoint inhibitors: Could any of them be used?
Presenter: Maria Menezes
Session: Poster session 13
1123P - Baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to immune checkpoint inhibition in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Mark Schuiveling
Session: Poster session 13
1124P - IL-6 as prognostic factor in adjuvant or metastatic skin cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: A deep biomarker analysis
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster session 13
1125P - Identification of a subset of metastatic melanoma patients demonstrating germline determined insensitivity to immunotherapy
Presenter: Benjamin Fairfax
Session: Poster session 13
1126P - REtrospective Study of definitive therapy for head and neck mUcosal MElanoma: The RESUME study
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster session 13
1127P - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced mucosal melanoma (MM): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: James Pham
Session: Poster session 13
1128P - A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of FHD-286, a novel BRG1/BRM (SMARCA4/SMARCA2) inhibitor, for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Sapna Patel
Session: Poster session 13
1129P - Effect of subsequent therapies including checkpoint inhibitors on overall survival in a phase III randomized trial of tebentafusp in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma: Long-term follow-up
Presenter: Marlana Orloff
Session: Poster session 13