Abstract 1121P
Background
In current clinical practice, LDH level is widely used as decision tool between anti-PD1 monotherapy (LDH low) versus combination of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 (LDH high). However, approximately only 50% of LDH low patients respond to anti-PD1. In stage III melanoma patients (generally LDH low) the interferon (IFN)g signature has been identified as strongest baseline marker for response to neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. Therefore, we addressed the question whether an IFNg signature could serve as additional biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low advanced melanoma patients.
Methods
Advanced melanoma patients participating in biobank study in the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy between April 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively identified. The IFNg-signature was analyzed on baseline paraffine tumor biopsies using mRNA sequencing. The cutoff between IFNg-high and IFNg-low cohorts was calculated using ROC curves on the objective response (OR).
Results
Forty-nine patients were included: the majority had cutaneous (98%) and BRAF wild type (53%) melanoma and stage M1c disease (39%, AJCC 8th edition). Patients with a high IFNg-signature at baseline showed a higher response rate to anti-PD1 (OR 86% vs 43%; p=0.016) and an improved progression free survival (p=0.046) and overall survival (p=0.064). Table: 1121P
IFNg low (n=46) | IFNg high (n=19) | |
Objective response | 15 (43%) | 12 (86%) |
median PFS (m, IQR) | 7.0 (2.0, 23.5) | 25.5 (7.0, 72.0) |
median OS (m, IQR) | 23.0 (12.0, 76.0) | 60.5 (37.0, 76.8) |
24 m PFS (%) | 27% (CI: 15.4-46.8) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
60 m PFS (%) | 15% (CI: 6.7-33.4) | 43% (CI: 23.4-78.5) |
24 m OS (%) | 46% (CI: 31.9-65.6) | 78% (CI: 59.8-100) |
60 m OS (%) | 31% (CI: 19.3-51.3) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
PFS, progression free survival; OS, overall survival; m, months; IQR, interquartile range; CI, 95% confidence interval.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that the IFNg-signature could become a biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low patients directing towards anti-PD1 monotherapy (in IFNg high patients) versus combination therapy, with either anti-LAG3 or anti-CTLA-4 in IFNg low patients. However, confirmation in larger cohorts and in other combination therapies is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Christian Blank's group.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P. Dimitriadis: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, will receive some possible revenues if the IFN-γ signature is being developed as clinical companion diagnostic: Signature oncology. D. Peeper: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest, o-founder, shareholder, and advisor: Immagene. C.U. Blank: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Third Rock Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Immagene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, intention to develop IFN signature algorithm: NewCo, no name yet; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, NanoString, 4SC; Other, pending patent: WO 2021/177822 A1. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1140P - Cemiplimab versus historical systemic treatments for locally advanced (la) or metastatic (m) cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCC): Results from the French study TOSCA
Presenter: Emilie Gerard
Session: Poster session 13
1141P - Early discontinuation of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Elena Croce
Session: Poster session 13
1142P - Personalized decision making in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Integrating a clinico-pathological model for absolute metastatic risk into the staging systems
Presenter: Marlies Wakkee
Session: Poster session 13
1143P - Changes in peripheral and local tumor immunity after cemiplimab treatment early describe clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Daniela Esposito
Session: Poster session 13
1144P - High-plex spatial profiling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to identify biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes: The cMIC study
Presenter: Rahul Ladwa
Session: Poster session 13
1145P - Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) treated with avelumab: Analysis of a prospective German MCC registry (MCC TRIM)
Presenter: Juergen Becker
Session: Poster session 13
1146P - Updated results from POD1UM-201: A phase II study of retifanlimab in patients with advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)
Presenter: Giovanni Grignani
Session: Poster session 13
1148P - Avelumab as second-line or later (2L+) treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC): Real-world tx patterns in France
Presenter: Astrid Blom Fily
Session: Poster session 13
1149P - Prognosis for patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma with a complete response on avelumab treatment
Presenter: Lisanne Zijlker
Session: Poster session 13