Abstract 1121P
Background
In current clinical practice, LDH level is widely used as decision tool between anti-PD1 monotherapy (LDH low) versus combination of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 (LDH high). However, approximately only 50% of LDH low patients respond to anti-PD1. In stage III melanoma patients (generally LDH low) the interferon (IFN)g signature has been identified as strongest baseline marker for response to neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. Therefore, we addressed the question whether an IFNg signature could serve as additional biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low advanced melanoma patients.
Methods
Advanced melanoma patients participating in biobank study in the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy between April 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively identified. The IFNg-signature was analyzed on baseline paraffine tumor biopsies using mRNA sequencing. The cutoff between IFNg-high and IFNg-low cohorts was calculated using ROC curves on the objective response (OR).
Results
Forty-nine patients were included: the majority had cutaneous (98%) and BRAF wild type (53%) melanoma and stage M1c disease (39%, AJCC 8th edition). Patients with a high IFNg-signature at baseline showed a higher response rate to anti-PD1 (OR 86% vs 43%; p=0.016) and an improved progression free survival (p=0.046) and overall survival (p=0.064). Table: 1121P
IFNg low (n=46) | IFNg high (n=19) | |
Objective response | 15 (43%) | 12 (86%) |
median PFS (m, IQR) | 7.0 (2.0, 23.5) | 25.5 (7.0, 72.0) |
median OS (m, IQR) | 23.0 (12.0, 76.0) | 60.5 (37.0, 76.8) |
24 m PFS (%) | 27% (CI: 15.4-46.8) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
60 m PFS (%) | 15% (CI: 6.7-33.4) | 43% (CI: 23.4-78.5) |
24 m OS (%) | 46% (CI: 31.9-65.6) | 78% (CI: 59.8-100) |
60 m OS (%) | 31% (CI: 19.3-51.3) | 50% (CI: 29.6-84.4) |
PFS, progression free survival; OS, overall survival; m, months; IQR, interquartile range; CI, 95% confidence interval.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that the IFNg-signature could become a biomarker for treatment decisions in LDH low patients directing towards anti-PD1 monotherapy (in IFNg high patients) versus combination therapy, with either anti-LAG3 or anti-CTLA-4 in IFNg low patients. However, confirmation in larger cohorts and in other combination therapies is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Christian Blank's group.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P. Dimitriadis: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, will receive some possible revenues if the IFN-γ signature is being developed as clinical companion diagnostic: Signature oncology. D. Peeper: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest, o-founder, shareholder, and advisor: Immagene. C.U. Blank: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Third Rock Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Immagene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, intention to develop IFN signature algorithm: NewCo, no name yet; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, NanoString, 4SC; Other, pending patent: WO 2021/177822 A1. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1160P - Methods of nivolumab administration in advanced melanoma: A comparison of patients’ clinical outcomes treated with flat dose or weight-adjusted dose, FLATIMEL study
Presenter: Iona Campo le Brun
Session: Poster session 13
1161P - Therapeutic outcome of molecular profiling of melanoma patients resistant to standard treatment: Real-world data
Presenter: Madona SAKKAL
Session: Poster session 13
1162P - Prolonged exposure to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) at the time of initiation of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) mediates better clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Kyrillus Shohdy
Session: Poster session 13
1163P - CD39 affect the prognostic role of NLR via N2 neutrophils in metastatic melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster session 13
1164P - Changes of TCR repertoire in metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab correlate with overall survival
Presenter: Martin Klabusay
Session: Poster session 13
1165P - Single cell spatial features of in-transit melanoma associated with patient outcome to immunotherapy
Presenter: Xinyu Bai
Session: Poster session 13
1166P - Multi-modal and longitudinal characterization of the tumor and immune microenvironment from primary melanoma to in-transit and distant metastasis
Presenter: Giuseppe Tarantino
Session: Poster session 13
1168P - Tumor PD-L1 predicts the outcome of PD-1-based immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma depending on the type of tissue examined
Presenter: Jan-Malte Placke
Session: Poster session 13
1169P - Tumour transcriptional and spatial protein profiling in Mexican patients reveals that acral lentiginous melanoma is characterized by an immunosuppressive microenvironment
Presenter: Martha Estefania Vázquez-Cruz
Session: Poster session 13
1170P - Survival outcome prediction of primary melanoma tumours from histology images using deep learning
Presenter: Céline Bossard
Session: Poster session 13