Abstract 1114P
Background
Combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in phase III clinical trials, and is standard of care for advanced/metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma. However there is limited evidence in the real-world.
Methods
BECARE is a retrospective study of EB in unresectable advanced/metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma in 21 sites from Spain. The study includes melanoma patients (pts) treated according to standard clinical practice with EB in the 1st or after progression to a 1st line with immune checkpoint inhibitors (IT) for advanced or metastatic stage. Previous BRAF- and/or MEK- inhibitor (other than adjuvant ended ≥ 6 m before EB) or chemotherapy was not allowed. The primary objective is to characterize the population of pts receiving EB and assess treatment efficacy and tolerability in the real world.
Results
From Sep 2021 to Mar 2023, 117 pts were included. Median age was 59 years (range: 23-89), 59.8% were male, 64.1% had ECOG 0, all pts had metastasis at inclusion, and 21.4% brain metastasis. LDH was elevated in 35.9% of pts. The median follow-up was 13.1 m (95% CI: 11.4-15.1). EB was administered as the 2nd line after IT in 28 (23.9%) pts. The median PFS and OS for pts with brain metastasis treated with EB in the 1st line was 6.3 m (95% CI: 6.2-12) and 10 m (95% CI: 7.4-NR), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 were reported in 17 (14.5%) pts, being the most common elevated liver enzymes (6%), diarrhea (2.6%) and fatigue (1.7%). Creatinine was increased in 3 (2.6%) pts, and eye disorders present in 6 (5.1%). EB was administered for a median of 10.7 m (95% CI: 8.2-12.6) and required dose reductions or interruptions due to AEs in 29 (24.8%) and 37 (31.6%) pts, respectively. Treatment was ended due to toxicity in 6 (5.1%) pts. Table: 1114P
EB treatment | ORR; n (%) | median PFS (95% CI); months | median OS (95% CI); months |
1 st line | 63 (75) | 12 (9.4-21.6) | 24.6 (14.8-NR) |
2 nd line after IT | 21 (77.8) | 12.5 (6.6-NR) | 13.9 (10.5-NR) |
Conclusions
EB confirmed efficacy in the real-world including pts with worse prognosis than clinical trials. EB is also a feasible option after IT. Toxicity consistent with previous experience.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Mfar Clinical Research staff for their assistance in the development of this abstract.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Melanoma (GEM).
Funding
Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Melanoma (GEM) as Sponsor with Industry partner Pierre Fabre Ibérica.
Disclosure
A. Soria: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi. S. Sequero: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Gilead. T. Puértolas: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Bristol, Immunocore, Novartis, Seagen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodation, Expenses: Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre. J. Fra Rodríguez: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, GSK, Pierre Fabre, Servier, BMS, PharmaMar, AAA. C. Aguayo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria for Continuous Medical Education: Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Roche. G. Benítez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck, AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Pierre Fabre. P. Ayala de Miguel: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, BMS. E. Muñoz-Couselo: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Roche. B. Campos: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Rovi, Leo Pharma, Sun Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1100P - Open-label non-randomized phase IB study to characterize the safety, tolerability and recommended dose of tinostamustin in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma (ENIGMA)
Presenter: Markus Joerger
Session: Poster session 13
1101P - The effect of LNS8801 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with treatment-refractory cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Jordi Rodon
Session: Poster session 13
1102P - Evaluation of surrogate endpoints for overall survival within the RELATIVITY-047 trial
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster session 13
1103P - Nivolumab (NIVO) plus relatlimab (RELA) vs NIVO in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: 2-year subgroup analyses from RELATIVITY-047
Presenter: Georgina Long
Session: Poster session 13
1104P - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic or non-resectable melanoma after failure of adjuvant anti-PD1 treatment: A EUMelareg real-world evidence study
Presenter: Michael Weichenthal
Session: Poster session 13
1105P - First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients previously treated with adjuvant systemic therapy
Presenter: Katarzyna Kozak
Session: Poster session 13
1106P - Anti-PD-1 (PD1) monotherapy or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 for metastatic melanoma (MM) patients (pts) with liver metastases (mets)
Presenter: Ines Pires da Silva
Session: Poster session 13
1107P - BRAF mutation status does not impact outcomes with tebentafusp in advanced cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Alexander Shoushtari
Session: Poster session 13
1108P - Outcomes of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma after cessation of immunotherapy following complete response or toxicities
Presenter: Nur Sakinah Zulkifli
Session: Poster session 13