Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4811 - Comprehensive genomic profiling of thymic carcinoma in a sample Chinese population
Presenter: Baohui Han
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2045 - The analysis of treatment sequences and clinical outcomes of thymic carcinoma
Presenter: Arakaki Motoko
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4785 - Transcriptomic Difference of Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma
Presenter: Naixin Liang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2864 - A Phase II Trial of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Seoyoung Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5015 - The study of tumor associated exosomes in crosstalk between esophageal carcinoma and lymphatic endothelial cells
Presenter: Weimin Mao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1339 - Up-regulation of IBSP expression predicts poor prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma patients
Presenter: Mingyue Wang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4083 - PD-L1 expression in primary tumour vs metastatic samples in the Phase 3 MYSTIC study in first-line metastatic (m) NSCLC
Presenter: Niels Reinmuth
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5113 - Assessing the impact of subsequent checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) treatment on overall survival: post hoc analyses from the phase 3 JAVELIN Lung 200 study of avelumab vs docetaxel in platinum-treated locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Fabrice Barlesi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4256 - Long-term avelumab treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): post hoc analyses from JAVELIN Solid Tumor
Presenter: Borys Hrinczenko
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4305 - Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in the treatment of lung cancer patients in France: Updated survival and subgroup analysis from the real-world EVIDENS study
Presenter: Fabrice Barlesi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract