Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
681 - Significance of the red blood cell distribution width in resected pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Gouji Toyokawa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3336 - Survival outcome of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: Comparing results between the database of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Zürich (CCCZ) and the Epidemiological Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug (KKR)
Presenter: Rolf A. Stahel
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2204 - NORA trial (GECP 15/02): Updated results of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) phase II trial of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT) with cisplatin (P) plus metronomic oral vinorelbine (mOV) for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC)
Presenter: María Guirado
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1446 - A nomogram to predict outcomes of lung cancer patients after pneumonectomy based on 47 indicators set by principle component analysis
Presenter: Bo Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1788 - Prognostic and predictive value of 18F-PET/CT on the response to treatment in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Cristina Alfaro Autor
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2299 - Comparison of three different chemotherapy regimens for concomitant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4211 - Predicting the first failure pattern in patients with inoperable local advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy: Establishment and internal validation of a nomogram based on the clinicopathological factors
Presenter: Xueru Zhu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1550 - Prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) pre and post chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Vicente Palomar Abril
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2345 - Meta-analysis evaluating neutropenia incidence with EGFR inhibitors and chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC
Presenter: Bernardo Rapoport
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3747 - Effector CD4+ T-cell induction by thoracic radiotherapy for patients with NSCLC
Presenter: Yu Miura
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract