Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3317 - Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with telisotuzumab vedotin (teliso-v), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting c-Met
Presenter: Rebecca Heist
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3887 - First Real Life Data on Durvalumab after definitive concomitant ChemoRadiotherapy (cCRT) in unresectable Stage (St) III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in France: Analysis of 591 patients (pts) enrolled in the French cohort (c) Temporary Authorization of Use (ATU)
Presenter: Virginie Avrillon
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
682 - EGFR Inhibitor Versus Chemotherapy as Adjuvant Treatment for Locally-advanced EGFR-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter: Peng Xie
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2509 - Afatinib in EGFR TKI-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC: interim analysis of a Phase IIIb, multi-national, open-label study
Presenter: Filippo de Marinis
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3300 - First-line ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced ALK rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ASCEND-4 Asian subgroup analysis
Presenter: Daniel SW Tan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2653 - A combined analysis of two Phase IIIb studies of afatinib in EGFR TKI-naïve patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC
Presenter: Filippo de Marinis
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3663 - Impact of plasma EGFR mutation fractions on response to first generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor in treatment of naïve non-small cell lung cancer patients
Presenter: Xiaohong Wang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5921 - Definition of an afatinib trough concentration threshold in the treatment of NSCLC
Presenter: Stephane Bouchet
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2852 - A Phase Ib Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Durvalumab(MEDI4736) for Potentially Resectable stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Beung chul AHN
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3273 - Low expression of Notch1 and combined Notch1/HES1 are associated with adverse survival factor for limited stage small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Jinsoo Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract