Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4369 - Biomarker testing of lung cancer in Spain
Presenter: Delvys Rodriguez Abreu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
603 - Mendelian Randomization Study of Alzheimer's Disease and Lung Cancer
Presenter: Huaqiang Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4462 - Spanish registry of thoracic tumors (TTR): Interim analyses of comorbidities, risk associations, personal and family history of cancer
Presenter: Rafael Lopez Castro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3957 - Pleural effusion TGF-beta is highly diagnostic and prognostic in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Paul Stockhammer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3583 - Immune microenvironment modulation by p14/ARF in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Presenter: Giulia Pasello
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4255 - Tumor Treating Fields plus chemotherapy for first-line malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): radiological responses in the STELLAR trial
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1803 - Effects of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields; 150 kHz) and Cisplatin or Pemetrexed Combination Therapy on Mesothelioma cells In Vitro and In Vivo
Presenter: Mijal Munster
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2660 - Real world use of systemic therapy in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)
Presenter: Susana Cedres
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3150 - Pemetrexed/Cisplatin versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as first-line treatment for Egyptian patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Mohamed Alorabi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4319 - Accuracy of pathologic evaluation for thymic epithelial tumors in an Italian reference Centre
Presenter: Giulia Galli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract