Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
490P - Outcomes of sequential epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)- a real-world institutional experience
Presenter: Yvonne Ang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
498P - An observational retrospective study to evaluate the incidence of acquired EGFR T790M resistance in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation following progression after at least one prior EGFR TKI treatment in Taiwan: ARISE study
Presenter: Shang-gin Wu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
501P - Clinical characteristics and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion and EGFR amplification
Presenter: Xin Gao
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
502P - Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with uncommon mutations: A multicenter observational study
Presenter: Masaki Kanazu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
482P - Interim analysis from a phase IIIb, open-label study of afatinib in EGFR TKI-naïve patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC
Presenter: Filippo De Marinis
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
483P - A phase IIIb, open-label study of afatinib in EGFR TKI-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: A biomarker analysis
Presenter: Rafael Rosell
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
484P - Activity of afatinib in patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC and baseline brain metastases: Pooled analysis of three large phase IIIb trials
Presenter: Maya Gottfried
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
491P - Clinical outcomes of leptomeningeal metastases in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Chia-I Shen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
510P - Paclitaxel as continuation maintenance therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Suzy Gohar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
496P - Higher osimertinib introduction rate achieved by multiple repeated re-biopsy after acquired resistance to first/second generation EGFR-TKIs
Presenter: Taira Ninomaru
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract