Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 06

1767P - Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in symptomatic desmoid tumor

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 06

Topics

Tumour Site

Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Presenters

Kjetil Boye

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1031-S1061. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1610

Authors

K. Boye1, A.T. Skeie2, M.R. Kobbeltvedt1, L. Hårklau3, A.B. Mariathasan4, G.H.N. Nguyen5, I.V.K. Lobmaier6, T. Hompland7, I. Hompland1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 - Oslo/NO
  • 2 Department Of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 - Oslo/NO
  • 3 Department Of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0586 - Oslo/NO
  • 4 Department Of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 - Oslo/NO
  • 5 Department Of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 - Oslo/NO
  • 6 Department Of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 - Oslo/NO
  • 7 Department Of Radiation Biology, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 - Oslo/NO

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1767P

Background

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is one of the available options for patients with desmoid tumor (DT) when active treatment is indicated. The aim of this study was to report the results with PLD in a population-based cohort of DT and to investigate the association between radiological response using RECIST, tumor volume measurements and clinical outcome.

Methods

Patients with DT treated with PLD at Oslo University Hospital were included. PLD 40 mg/m2 was given every 4 weeks for up to 9 cycles. Radiological response was determined using RECIST v1.1 and using tumor volume measurements.

Results

From 2015 to 2023, 29 patients received PLD. The indication for active therapy was symptoms in 26 patients and symptoms and tumor growth at a critical anatomical site in 3 patients. The most frequent tumor location was intraabdominal (8), abdominal wall (8), and extremity/trunk wall (8). Eight patients had FAP-associated DT. Active surveillance was the initial strategy in 22 patients. The median time from diagnosis to active treatment was 6 (range 2-171) months. PLD was given as first line treatment in 26 patients. The median number of cycles was 6 (range 3-9) and 24 patients received at least 6 cycles. The overall response rate according to RECIST v1.1 was 66% (1 CR and 18 PR). Eight patients (28%) had SD and 2 patients (7%) had PD as their best response. The median time to the best response was 17 (range 3-44) months. A reduction in tumor volume was observed in 27 of 29 patients. The median decrease was 78% (range -99% to +114%). A high degree of correlation between percent change by RECIST and tumor volume was observed (r=0.856; 95% CI 0.714-0.931). Symptom improvement was reported by 19 patients, of whom all had a decrease in tumor size by RECIST (1 CR, 15 PR and 3 SD). After a median follow-up of 25 months, PD was recorded in 3 of the 27 patients with initial CR/PR/SD. No cardiac toxicity, secondary cancer, or death was registered.

Conclusions

Treatment with PLD resulted in radiological response and improvement of symptoms in the majority of patients, indicating that PLD is an effective treatment option in symptomatic DF. All patients with symptom improvement had a reduction in tumor size. A strong correlation between RECIST and tumor volume measurement was observed.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Oslo University Hospital.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

K. Boye: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Expert testimony on national applications to regulatory authorities: Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer, GSK, Incyte, NEC Oncoimmunity, Deciphera; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Deciphera; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Eli Lilly; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Deciphera, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Product Samples: Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.