Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 06

1740P - Surufatinib combined with gemcitabine in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients failed with anthracyclines chemotherapy or monotherapy post-anlotinib progression: A multi-center, phase II trial

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 06

Topics

Tumour Site

Sarcoma

Presenters

Yuhong Zhou

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1031-S1061. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1610

Authors

Y. Zhou1, X. Niu2, X. Guo1, Z. Huang2, W. Li1, W. Liu2, H. Xu2, Y. You1, C. Zhang1, R. Zhuang1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology Department, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, 200032 - Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Department Of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital - Xinjiekou Branch, 100035 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1740P

Background

Surufatinib (S), a novel small-molecule inhibitor targeting VEGFR-1, 2, 3, FGFR-1 and CSF-1R, has showed promising efficacy in recurrent STS patients (pts). Herein, we explored the efficacy and safety of S plus gemcitabine in STS pts progressed on first-line anthracyclines chemotherapy or anlotinib, an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

Methods

In this multi-center, phase II study (ChiCTR2100053490), two cohorts were established. Eligible pts with STS failed to first-line anthracyclines chemotherapy were enrolled in cohort 1 and received S (250 mg, qd, po, q3w) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, iv, d1, d8, q3w). Pts failed with anlotinib were assigned to cohort 2 and received S (300 mg, qd, po, q4w). Primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included 8-week PFR (cohort 2 only), ORR, DCR, OS and safety.

Results

Up to 15 Apr, 2024, 17 pts were included in cohort 1 [median age 59 years, female 70.6%, leiomyosarcoma (LMS) 52.9%, lung metastases 64.7%]. In cohort 2, 8 patients were enrolled (median age 51.5 years, female 50%, 62.5% pts failed with at least 3 lines of previous therapies). In cohort 1, all 17 pts were evaluable, with an ORR of 17.65% and DCR of 82.35%. Median PFS (mPFS) was 4.37 months, with pts with lung metastases showing longer mPFS (11.66 vs 3.70 months, p=0.3213). mPFS in 9 LMS pts was 5.65 months with an ORR of 22.2%. In cohorts 2, 8 pts were evaluable, with mPFS of 3.25 months, and an 8-week PFR of 87.5%. In subgroup analysis, mPFS of pts received S as less than 4 lines of therapy was 3.61 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (total; grade ≥3) in cohort 1 included hypothyroidism (29.4%; 0), proteinuria (17.6%; 5.9%), and neutrophil count decreased (17.6%; 5.9%); in cohort 2 were diarrhea (37.5%; 0), urinary tract infection (25.0%; 0), hypertension (12.5%; 12.5%).

Conclusions

Surufatinib combined with gemcitabine showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in STS pts failed in first-line standard chemotherapy, especially for pts with lung metastases. Additionally, surufatinib monotherapy also exhibited promising efficacy in pts previously treated with anti-angiogenic TKIs.

Clinical trial identification

ChiCTR2100053490.

Editorial acknowledgement

Funding

Hutchison Medi Pharma.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.