Abstract 538P
Background
CCS and HIPEC are used as therapeutic approaches for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. However, the combination of hepatectomy with CCS and HIPEC in patients with liver metastasis is emerging as a controversial topic in the medical field.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for studies comparing combined hepatectomy with CRS and HIPEC for metastatic liver and peritoneal tumors with HIPEC alone for peritoneal metastasis in patients with primary colorectal cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software 4.3.2. We considered as significant p values < 0.05.
Results
We included 959 patients from 9 retrospective studies. The mean age in the combined group was 57.42 and in the group with HIPEC alone, it was 55.72 years. The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 12.01 in the combined group and 9.29 in the control group. The mean overall survival (OS) was 27.99 months for the intervention and 36.89 for the control, and the mean disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 10.34 and 13.27 months, respectively. The mean follow-up in the studies was 43.35 months. The 5-year OS was not significantly different between the groups (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.99–1.89; p = 0.06). Additionally, the intervention group showed a significantly higher length of ICU stay (MD 0.72 days; 95% CI 0.20–1.23; p < 0.01) and length of hospital stay (MD 6.71 days; 95% CI 3.24–10.17; p < 0.01), with an already expected increase in operative time (MD 53.44 minutes; 95% CI -3.91–110.79; p = 0.07). The intervention group also showed higher severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo >3) (33.33% vs. 18.72%; OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.50–4.18; p < 0.001). The recurrence rate was higher in the intervention group, even though it was not statistically significant (62.63% vs. 55.16%; OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.55–2.16; p = 0.803).
Conclusions
Our analysis showed that combining CRS and HIPEC with hepatectomy leads to a higher morbidity, and recurrence rate, with a lower mean OS and DFS. Therefore, combining CCS and HIPEC with hepatectomy should be avoided.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
434TiP - ALTER-BC-Ib-01: A prospective phase Ib study of anlotinib with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for HER2-low unresectable (u)/metastatic (m) breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Yanchun Meng
Session: Poster session 15
436TiP - DYNASTY-Breast02: A phase III trial of BNT323/DB-1303 vs investigator's choice chemotherapy in HER2-low, hormone receptor positive, metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Session: Poster session 15
437TiP - An open-label, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BB-1701, a novel antibody drug conjugate (ADC) targeting HER2, in previously treated patients (pts) with HER2+ or HER2-low unresectable or metastatic (M) breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Mridula George
Session: Poster session 15
439TiP - AVZO-021-1001: A first-in-human open-label, multicenter phase I/II dose-escalation and expansion study evaluating AVZO-021 in adult patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Afshin Dowlati
Session: Poster session 15
517P - Circulating tumor DNA driving anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: The RASINTRO prospective multicenter study
Presenter: Aziz Zaanan
Session: Poster session 15
520P - Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer with and without liver metastasis: A subgroup analysis of the phase III FRESCO-2 trial
Presenter: Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
Session: Poster session 15
521P - XELOX +bev +tislelizumab for first-line treatment of MSS/pMMR RAS-mutated mCRC: A single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Kai Ou
Session: Poster session 15