Abstract 538P
Background
CCS and HIPEC are used as therapeutic approaches for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. However, the combination of hepatectomy with CCS and HIPEC in patients with liver metastasis is emerging as a controversial topic in the medical field.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for studies comparing combined hepatectomy with CRS and HIPEC for metastatic liver and peritoneal tumors with HIPEC alone for peritoneal metastasis in patients with primary colorectal cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software 4.3.2. We considered as significant p values < 0.05.
Results
We included 959 patients from 9 retrospective studies. The mean age in the combined group was 57.42 and in the group with HIPEC alone, it was 55.72 years. The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 12.01 in the combined group and 9.29 in the control group. The mean overall survival (OS) was 27.99 months for the intervention and 36.89 for the control, and the mean disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 10.34 and 13.27 months, respectively. The mean follow-up in the studies was 43.35 months. The 5-year OS was not significantly different between the groups (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.99–1.89; p = 0.06). Additionally, the intervention group showed a significantly higher length of ICU stay (MD 0.72 days; 95% CI 0.20–1.23; p < 0.01) and length of hospital stay (MD 6.71 days; 95% CI 3.24–10.17; p < 0.01), with an already expected increase in operative time (MD 53.44 minutes; 95% CI -3.91–110.79; p = 0.07). The intervention group also showed higher severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo >3) (33.33% vs. 18.72%; OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.50–4.18; p < 0.001). The recurrence rate was higher in the intervention group, even though it was not statistically significant (62.63% vs. 55.16%; OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.55–2.16; p = 0.803).
Conclusions
Our analysis showed that combining CRS and HIPEC with hepatectomy leads to a higher morbidity, and recurrence rate, with a lower mean OS and DFS. Therefore, combining CCS and HIPEC with hepatectomy should be avoided.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
393P - A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TSL-1502 capsules in breast cancer patients with germline BRCA mutations
Presenter: Bo Lan
Session: Poster session 15
394P - Quantitative standardized high sensitivity (HS)-HER2 testing predicts outcomes with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
Presenter: Paolo Tarantino
Session: Poster session 15
395P - Receptor status heterogeneity during metastatic breast cancer treatment
Presenter: Sandra Geurts
Session: Poster session 15
396P - Evaluation of MUC1-C/CD3 biparatopic-bispecific (BPBS) T cell engager as an immunotherapeutic agent for the treatment of MUC1-expressing metastatic breast cancer (mBC)
Presenter: Ravi Jasuja
Session: Poster session 15
397P - Survival of de novo metastatic breast cancer according to biomarker status in Denmark and Norway: A register-based cohort study
Presenter: Johan Liseth Hansen
Session: Poster session 15
398P - Age and ethnic-driven molecular and clinical disparity of East Asian breast cancers
Presenter: Ji Yoon Lee
Session: Poster session 15
399P - Treatment patterns and outcomes in HER2-low, HR+ metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with endocrine therapy in the United States
Presenter: Shanu Modi
Session: Poster session 15
400P - LncRNA-LINC00294 functions as a ceRNA in regulating JUP through competitively binding to miR-485-5p in breast cancer
Presenter: Ting Yang
Session: Poster session 15
Resources:
Abstract
401P - Evaluation of HER2 scoring in breast carcinoma-stained whole slide images
Presenter: Céline Bossard
Session: Poster session 15
402P - Inflammatory biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Kuikui Jiang
Session: Poster session 15