Abstract 538P
Background
CCS and HIPEC are used as therapeutic approaches for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. However, the combination of hepatectomy with CCS and HIPEC in patients with liver metastasis is emerging as a controversial topic in the medical field.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for studies comparing combined hepatectomy with CRS and HIPEC for metastatic liver and peritoneal tumors with HIPEC alone for peritoneal metastasis in patients with primary colorectal cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software 4.3.2. We considered as significant p values < 0.05.
Results
We included 959 patients from 9 retrospective studies. The mean age in the combined group was 57.42 and in the group with HIPEC alone, it was 55.72 years. The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 12.01 in the combined group and 9.29 in the control group. The mean overall survival (OS) was 27.99 months for the intervention and 36.89 for the control, and the mean disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 10.34 and 13.27 months, respectively. The mean follow-up in the studies was 43.35 months. The 5-year OS was not significantly different between the groups (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.99–1.89; p = 0.06). Additionally, the intervention group showed a significantly higher length of ICU stay (MD 0.72 days; 95% CI 0.20–1.23; p < 0.01) and length of hospital stay (MD 6.71 days; 95% CI 3.24–10.17; p < 0.01), with an already expected increase in operative time (MD 53.44 minutes; 95% CI -3.91–110.79; p = 0.07). The intervention group also showed higher severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo >3) (33.33% vs. 18.72%; OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.50–4.18; p < 0.001). The recurrence rate was higher in the intervention group, even though it was not statistically significant (62.63% vs. 55.16%; OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.55–2.16; p = 0.803).
Conclusions
Our analysis showed that combining CRS and HIPEC with hepatectomy leads to a higher morbidity, and recurrence rate, with a lower mean OS and DFS. Therefore, combining CCS and HIPEC with hepatectomy should be avoided.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
403P - Stemness-targeted therapies to inhibit cancer cell plasticity in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Andrew Takchi
Session: Poster session 15
404P - Real-world analysis on molecular targeted therapy recommendations and attainment rates in cancer gene panel testing for metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Hiroshi Tada
Session: Poster session 15
405P - HRD biomarkers in blood samples from BRCA1/BRCA2-associated advanced breast cancer (BC) patients (pts)
Presenter: Violeta Serra
Session: Poster session 15
406P - Genomic landscape of endocrine therapy (ET)-resistant BRCA1/2 and PALB2 altered metastatic breast cancer (mBC)
Presenter: Abeid Omar
Session: Poster session 15
407P - Genomic profiling and prediction role of the molecular tumor burden index in advanced HR+HER2- breast cancer
Presenter: Xuenan Peng
Session: Poster session 15
408P - Characterizing the genomic landscape of breast cancer in an Irish cohort of patients
Presenter: Georgia Thodi
Session: Poster session 15
409P - Biological tumor traits predicting late recurrence in premenopausal breast cancer patients: Insights from the STO-5 trial with 20-year follow-up
Presenter: Jo De Vos
Session: Poster session 15
410P - Breast cancer lighthouse non-interventional hybrid real-world study: Molecular characterization and 2-year effectiveness data
Presenter: Angela Margarida Nogal Dias
Session: Poster session 15
412P - Exploratory circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and impact on clinical efficacy with sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in TROPiCS-02
Presenter: Hope Rugo
Session: Poster session 15