Abstract 519P
Background
Cetuximab and capecitabine are both standard first-line treatment options for RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients. However, no phase III clinical trial data are currently available for the combination of cetuximab and capecitabine as maintenance treatment. Here we present the data of 80 Chinese RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients in the C-CLASSIC study.
Methods
RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients who achieved disease control after first-line induction therapy with 9 cycles of FOLFOX plus cetuximab were randomized (1:1) to receive maintenance treatment with cetuximab + capecitabine (Arm A) and cetuximab alone (Arm B) . The primary endpoint was maintenance progression free survival (mPFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL) and safety. This study was terminated early due to the speed of enrollment.
Results
By December 31, 2023, 80 patients were randomized to Arms A (n=42) and B (n=38). Primary tumors were left-sided in 74 patients (92.5%), and 81.3% of patients achieved PR or CR after induction treatment. After a median follow-up of 14.0 m, mPFS were 7.3 m (95% CI 5.32-11.24) and 5.3 m (95% CI 3.02-7.46) in Arms A and B, respectively [HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.365-1.011)]; median OS were 30.5 m (95% CI 19.09-NA) and 22.5 m (95% CI 13.01-NA), respectively [HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.271-1.242)].The QoL did not deteriorate further in either treatment group versus baseline. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were detected in 36.6% and 13.2% of Arms A and B, respectively.
Conclusions
Maintenance therapy with cetuximab + capecitabine showed a trend of improved efficacy compared with cetuximab in RAS/BRAF wt patients.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04262635.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
R. Xu.
Funding
This study was funded by Merck Serono, Beijing, China, an affiliate of Merck KGaA; Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No.2019A1515011786); The National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172711); The National Natural Science Foundation of China (82321003, 81930065, 82173128).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
375P - Results from the Danish Breast Cancer Group's (DBCG) NAME-trial: A direct comparison of oral navelbine given either classic or metronomic in metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen
Session: Poster session 15
376P - Evaluating adherence to oral anticancer medications in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rana El-Shewy
Session: Poster session 15
377P - Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil in pre-treated patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: A Dutch BOOG (2019-01 TIBET) study
Presenter: Niels Guchelaar
Session: Poster session 15
378P - Updated data on real-world efficacy and safety of inetetamab-based therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with prior exposure to trastuzumab
Presenter: Duan Yang
Session: Poster session 15
379P - Safety and efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan and concomitant radiation therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A multicentre international retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Luca Visani
Session: Poster session 15
381P - Treatment rechallenge after grade 1 trastuzumab-deruxtecan related interstitial lung disease: A real-world experience
Presenter: Kelsey Natsuhara
Session: Poster session 15
382P - Pyrotinib combined with metronomic oral etoposide (VP-16) in heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Jiaxuan Liu
Session: Poster session 15